--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: >> I could well be wrong, but I don't have the impression > that there's a "proceeding from" question with rishi- > devata-chhandas. MMY spoke of "the Samhita of rishi-devata- > chhandas," rather than suggesting that there's a sequence. > I suspect the sequence idea is strictly Western, making it > linear rather than self-referential. > > So at least in that sense the two "trinities" may not be > comparable. But I'm not knowledgeable enough either about > Christian Trinitarian theology or the metaphysics of > Samhita to do anything but guess.
Yep, just conjecturing here too. Though one could perhaps make a case for rishi as being predominant in the enlivenment of C.C., devata in G.C. and chhandas in U.C. (as I have done with my 9-chakra-model system of the 27 states of being, soncsiousness, and bliss), and thus in that sense sequential, it is after all just another model and you know I don't really hold with sequential milestones being de rigeur anyhow :-)
