What a doofus. I'll give him ten bucks for the sandals, free shipping.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tedadams108 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Ok, forget about the famous meditator references. My main point is the
> contradiction between representing Maharishi as bad in the film but
> glorifying the man in the sandals. Can't have it both ways. The sandals are
> more valuable when worn by someone of high regard. Mark did not speak well of
> Maharishi in the film.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > The idea you are floating here, that the loyal devotees became wealthy and
> > those who criticized ended up poor, is plain daft.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tedadams108 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm a little confused. Is this the same Mark Landau who spoke such unkind
> > > words about Maharishi in the film "David Wants To Fly."? When attempting
> > > to sell Maharishi's sandals there are no unkind words spoken, only
> > > glorifying words, probably as an attempt to increase the marketability of
> > > the sandals.
> > > I have compassion for Mark that he is having financial
> > > challenges in this economy, like so many others. Apparently his
> > > involvement with Maharishi did not result in financial well being
> > > as it did for so many others (John Gray, Barbara DeAngeles, Deepak
> > > Chopra, etc., and the many wealthy meditators living in Fairfield and
> > > around the world. Maybe it's more difficult to get Nature Support when
> > > one cavils about the Master. I'm sure someone would
> > > appreciate having the sandals and would be willing to pay something
> > > for them. My guess is that the only value to Mark would be for firewood.
> > >
> >
>
