Let's not rate.  Let's call it a complex experiment that didn't quite gel.  I 
did have some fun with it, though.

On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:26 PM, maskedzebra wrote:

> Did you just out-irony me or something, Mark? Seems so.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mark Landau <m@...> wrote:
> >
> > Wow, are you kidding? So much for loyalty. You're gonna let Sal dictate our 
> > interaction and laud her to the skies? What kind of man are you? Canadian? 
> > Let's undo everything that happened between us right now. Ready, set, go 
> > back to your pre-Mark condition.
> > And where did sexuality come from in all this? Perhaps that was Sal's 
> > intended innuendo, but it sure wasn't based in reality. Or are you saying 
> > that it was and then denying it in a subsequent post?
> > I, as you probably know from my earlier response, read it differently--the 
> > written word can be so hard to read, if you will, and I can be 
> > dense--sexuality didn't even occur to me till I read this. (Of course what 
> > could lend itself better to such an interpretation than "I'm glad you like 
> > it. That goes for both of us.") It was more like FFL: unlimited 
> > vituperation always welcome, but please, anything cozy is barely 
> > tolerable... No lovefests (Why, oh Judy, is this not an accepted word or 
> > phrase? Isn't it common?) allowed, sexual or otherwise. But where does this 
> > come from? Those who crave only to vent their pain?
> > Anyhoo, piss ant, better back off. Someone else might not like it. And I'll 
> > withhold any insights I might have into you, too, as I have just done. 
> > Better all around that way.
> > (Sal, you are good. Wanna get a room together somewhere? But I'd better be 
> > careful here. As previously stated, I'm not even sure if you're a man or a 
> > woman...)
> > 
> > On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:53 AM, maskedzebra wrote:
> > 
> > > Your objective sensitivity and discretion scares me, Sal—awesome. The 
> > > Brokeback thing—I didn't realize it, but definitely it was there. Sad, 
> > > really. But your fast (and functional) wit has saved me. I am pulling 
> > > back on the Mark thing. I just have to remember: Go deeper, Robin: 
> > > remember: Sal is around. She plumbs the depths of things like this. Be 
> > > careful.
> > > 
> > > And so I will be from now on, Sal. You're most dazzling than Michael's 
> > > first moonwalk.
> > > 
> > > Too much sunshine. Love ya, Baby Sal.
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Would you two like to get a room together
> > > > somewhere?
> > > > Sal
> > > > 
> > > > On Sep 17, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Mark Landau wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I'm glad you like it. That goes for both of us. But then what comes 
> > > > > next? I won't, I must must admit, be reading all your posts. But if I 
> > > > > do feel I see something in you, did you just give me permission to 
> > > > > post it here (not, necessarily, that it will happen)? And I agree 
> > > > > about Peter, all that you say here. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:57 PM, maskedzebra wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> But you will understand why I must break this off here (LW).
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> I can feel even in this moment your consciousness upon me—and I like 
> > > > >> it.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Robin 
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to