--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 15, 2005, at 1:32 PM, authfriend wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>> Since there is nothing *for* him to "share" about
> >>> the transmission details of the technique--as I
> >>> just pointed out in the post you're responding to
> >>> and quote above (i.e., it wasn't "transmitted" to
> >>> him in the first place)--how could the fact that
> >>> he doesn't share nonexistent details of a nonexistent
> >>> transmission arouse suspicion?
> >>
> >> How could there be "nothing"?
> >>
> >> Are you using the True Believer "he cognized them" card?
> >
> > Just read this and get back to me, OK?
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/c3owb
> >
> I guess I am to assume you are referring to this, which is really 
> nothing new:

No, of course this isn't what I'm referring to.
You couldn't be bothered to read further than
the third paragraph?

Search for the paragraph beginning "Such a reversal..."
and read from there to the section "Growth of the
Transcendental Meditation Program."  If that's too
much of a burden, search for the paragraph beginning
"By the process of comparing..." and read down to
the quote from his address at Maharishi Nagar.

But you'll miss some interesting background if you
only read this shorter section.








> "The discovery is of the effects of the Transcendental
>   Meditation technique, whose introduction in 1958 was the work of
>   an Indian scholar and teacher, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. In fact,
>   Maharishi himself claims not to have invented the technique at
>   all, but rather to have revived it. It is clear, however, that
>   he reinvented it; that is to say, he rediscovered and thereby
>   restored the original purity and effectiveness of a layer of
>   human knowledge that, although praised and sung in the very
>   oldest records of human experience, seems somehow to have been
>   lost from view through confusion and disuse, even in the land of
>   its origin. "
> 
> If he revived it, then it is "revived" from *something*, as in 
reviving 
> the corpse, the "corpse" is revived. What is that something that 
was 
> revived?
> 
> Of course it is also so deliberately vague.
> 
> (I am not going to play semantical circle games on this.)





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to