The chamomile I am enjoying this wonderful evening, precisely steeped, ensconced in a delicate, perfect cup, tendrils of escaping tea steam wafting through the cheery room is just...just the cat's pajamas! Have A *Nice* Day!!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > My first attempt to reply to this post got eaten. I will try again. > > I guess you have to look at one's track record and frequency in making > such remarks. I've made my share. It just shows how I can be guilty of > the same behavior I am condemning in Ravi. I remember exactly what > provoked me to make such a remark. I felt she was mood making. It shows > my intolerance. Although I have to say, that I don't regret making that > remark, and under the same circumstances, I might very well make it > again. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > wrote: > > > > > > Look, I'm rushing here, but a couple things. > > > IIRC, Ravi at one point, once he realized Sal was a "she", and not a > > > "he", said he felt he should show a little more decorum. I realize I > > > may get pegged as a sexist, but I'm just telling you what he said. > > > So, if someone is on record with saying something like that, and > then > > > goes into a profane tirade, against a female he feels insulted him, > or > > > his beloved, then I call that being a hypocrite. Of course Ravi has > a > > > long history of abiding by rules he holds as sacred one day, and > then > > > breaking them the next. That's part of being enlightened, of course. > > > Second, we are a public forum. Even though in the past, I've said > I'm > > > not a prude, I guess I am a little. And, blast me if you will Bob, > but > > > I'm thinking of some of the casual readers to FFL, and I include my > > > wife in this, (although I think it is rare that she might read it). > > > Yea, I might have felt a little embarrassed by Ravi's BJ tirade. > > > But since I had voiced an objection earlier, and no one else chimed > in, > > > I assumed no one else had a problem with it. And that was okay with > me. > > > > In light of what you've written now, how do you explain what you wrote > back in Oct 2008? > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/193702 > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com/msg140748.html > > > > "Let's have a party in your mouth. Everybody can come." That's > obviously a not so subtle reference to oral sex, and you directed it and > the rest of your cruel invective at a woman whose only crime was making > a friendly chatty post about coffee. How can you write a post like that > but object to Ravi's BJ tirade? > > >
