--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > Waht does the new course cost? > > > > AS an aside, this is rather amzing that a new course is being > > offered. they are expanidn gon the MMY's TM and siddhis -a > > new step. It could also be that they need the income from > > this course. > > > > I would love to see an official description of it and how > > it all works. Your info is always welcome, but I can't > > really figure out what this is all about from your > > description and the way you write. > > $85. Here is an intro: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSMrAB4vV_c > > The Individual is Cosmic: Experience the Beautiful Electronic > Model of Vedic Physiology
Looks to me like a big "Invisible Man" full of LEDs, used as a focus for idol worship and moodmaking. :-) But hey!...placebos work, so if you've drunk enough of the Kool-Aid over the years, this one might work for you, too. What I'm wondering, though, is whether you have to keep going back every so often to get another hit off the bong...uh...I mean idol. :-) > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Dear Turq, Yep, the thing that I heard that was interesting was the > > > positioning of the 'Ved and Physiology' course, which is taught as a > > > continuing education course, as a technique. > > > > > > It is a technique that is practiced like a guided meditation, a > > > mindfulness meditative process that effectively clears and turns on the > > > subtle energetic system. In presentation it blends sci-ency and vedic > > > terminology. They don't use the term, 'chakra' but that is what they > > > are working on. They are catching up to where so much of the meditating > > > community has gone on to otherwise. > > > > > > To me this was interesting in the 'post-founder era' in that they can now > > > proceed in a progressive way towards offering a teaching as developed > > > spiritual technique. It is a blending of sciency and vedic TM > > > nomenclature. As a course it has been piloted on campus here, at > > > Vlodrop and movement facilities. Bevan at the lecture mentioned that > > > over 200 have taken the course here. > > > > > > Taking the course features an electronic audio-visual gizmo which > > > Nadaraam and Maharishi devised that leads the meditation through the > > > physiology. It is good, it will ground a lot of people in their subtle > > > system bodies and probably improve a lot of health in people who can be > > > bright on their top registers but dull and not hardly embodied otherwise. > > > It provides something spiritually that was missing for TM virgins that > > > will be good. > > > > > > It is highly amusing that it is a mindfulness kind of process. It is the > > > thing to take on campus right now. People are repeating it, taking it > > > two and three times & more, for the experiential component of meditating > > > with the audio-visual guidance. > > > > > > FFL, > > > -Buck in FF > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds really good - glad you were able to go. > > > > > > > > > > Yep, I have to thank Raja John Hagelin for granting me an > > > > > exemption to attend the meeting. It was very nice . > > > > > > > > Thank you for providing this information, Buck. > > > > I was going to ask how someone who was recently > > > > turned down for a dome pass got to attend. And > > > > I'm happy that you *got* to attend, if you found > > > > it valuable or meaningful. Really. > > > > > > > > > > > > But, that said, was there anything *in particular* > > > > he said that resonated with you? You are often > > > > WAY too vague on this forum. Just as I'd like to > > > > see King Tony deal with a real world audience for > > > > once, I'd like to see you get real with us for > > > > once and tell us what still gets you off about > > > > the TM dogma. > > > > > > > > > >
