--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > You and Susan need to start at post #300408--read it all, > including the quotes from previous posts--and then read > forward. This all began with a gratuitous slam of Ravi > from Curtis in that post, and it escalated between them > from there.
I took your advice and started reading a #300408. I had read most of it before. What I heard, in summary, was Curtis responding to Ravi's New Year's drunk party stuff with a statement about it sounding like a SNL skit on Jerry Falwell. Next thing, Ravi talks about some events in a bar with a young girl, tossing in his sexual lingo to pick up the drama, then Curtis replied by taking it seriously and putting Ravi down. Ravi responded by saying Curtis was a fool to think Ravi was telling the truth (and Ravi announces that he had made it all up) and further that Curtis had some twisted stuff going on if he could not tell Ravi had been lying. Then it all deteriorates from there..................... I still am waiting to hear from you: do you think it is ok for Ravi to have told that nasty personal lie about Curtis? > > Curtis is supposedly the reasonable one. He could have > stopped the escalation after Ravi made his accusation, > leaving Ravi twisting slowly, slowly in the wind, by > simply denying it and pointing out, as he did to me > (as though I wasn't already well aware of it), the > enormous unlikelihood that if he'd done what Ravi > claimed, it would have long since come out and been hung > around his neck. > > He chose a different course. > > As to my initial three-word intervention and what > followed, please contemplate the phrase "getting a taste > of one's own medicine." > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > Judy, > > I am not sure I understand this. One the one hand, the big complaint > > about Curtis is that he refuses to censure Barry for the many personal > > attacks which Barry levels against many here. > > And because of this, you don't feel any compunction to rein Ravi in for > > the personal attacks he levels against many here? Or it may be that you > > feel Ravi's attacks have merit. > > Really, I would appreciate a little clarification in this regard, if you > > don't mind. > > Thanks > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > > > > I appreciate your effort here Steve. With Judy doubling > > > > down in her support of this guy > > > > > > Beneath contempt, again. >
