--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > I still am waiting to hear from you: do you think it is > > > > > > ok for Ravi to have told that nasty personal lie about > > > > > > Curtis? > > > > > > > > > > See if you can rephrase your question so it's not offensive > > > > > and I'll consider answering it. > > > > > > > > Do you think it is ok for Ravi to have told that particular > > > > lie about Curtis's leaving the TM movement? > > > > > > Let's see, "Does Judy think it's OK to tell lies?" > > > > > > Nope, still offensive. > > > > Uh, I asked if you think it is ok if Ravi told a Particular > > lie in a Particular instance? Not a general statement about > > how you feel about lying in general (Does Judy think it is OK > > to tell lies?). > > So you're unsure of whether a negative response to "Does > Judy think it's OK to tell lies?" would cover all lies. > > I see. > > > A bit of difference, as you well know and would be quite > > quick to point out in others. > > Not if I were paying attention and wanted to be fair. > > > But in your dodging around and unwillingness to answer > > I got my answer. > > You can manufacture whatever answers and degree of > willingness suit your agenda, Susan. They don't have to > have anything to do with reality.
Hey, whatever. I don't want to hide behind analysis of details and words. Just simple responses would have been enough for me. I am done with this discussion, no interest left. >
