Vile, you say? I guess you are aligned with the British revisionism when translating the Vedic literature then huh? The Vedic literature itself is not puritanical and uncomfortable with human sexuality. Quite the contrary, it celebrates it and uses it as a consistent metaphor. Have you not read the Lingum Purna which even in stuffy translation reads like a porno novel on shrooms.
And have you ever seen the murals on those Indian temples in the South that Maharishi was so eager to visit? And even if you go for Krishna in the water with multiple Gopis "sporting like elephants" as metaphors for consciousness details, the images they picked makes Girls Gone Wild look like a librarian's convention. (But when they take off their glasses and shake their hair loose after the Cyber Dewie Decimal System lecture, look out!) Seriously Nabbie you are in serious denial about the metaphoric choices in your own tradition. What do you think comes after, the frog desires water, the physician desires disease in the uncensored version of the Rig Veda? Can you really be that clueless? And I am vile! No, neither the Vedas nor I are vile for using sexual image metaphors. Don't you think they knew how to interest humans on this planet at least as well as the guy who sells cars on TV or do you think the chick on the hood of the car in the bikini is just holding the hood down? And why exactly are you still reading my posts? At this point I'm gunna have to draw my own conclusions. Was I the guy who wrote it into the Mahabharata that 5 brothers shared one wife? Tell me that isn't right out of a Japanese Bukkake flick. But I am the vile one for pointing it out. Do you know what a lingum and a yoni are? Are you so hopelessly naive that you don't get what pouring milk over a lingum so it flows into the yoni is all about. They chose this image and there is nothing vile about it. Maharishi was the king of a none for you, all for me attitude about sex. He postured as a prude while living a life of a rockstar with ALL the perky perks. He was a Republican (build a bigger bomb) hypocrite about sex. I hope at least you are also a hypocrite in this area and didn't buy into the BS, cuz if you did, you really wasted your youth. One of the things I would need to see in any spiritual system that claims to explain all of life's secrets is a comfort and natural connection with our full humanness above the pathetic puritanical shaming that demonstrates that you aren't even comfortable with your own body let alone have secrets about the universe. You don't help your cause at all with this denial laden, prudish posturing. But I will concede one point Nabbie, Duct taping 3 Filipino hookers together to simulate the Vedic options available with the Divine one is a bit vile. You really need to use stage gaffer tape so it is easier to remove. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardatrwilliamsdotus" <richard@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.maharishiphotos.com/divine.html > > > > > > curtisdeltablues: > > > ...I've got an idea that revolves around 3 > > > Filipino hookers and a roll of duct tape that > > > I want to run by you. > > > > > So, you want to talk more about your sexual > > activities again. Where do you think this will > > put you on the Google search? Why would anyone > > need duct tape on 3 Filipino 'hookers'? > > > > Go figure. > > > > Over the years the vile and sarcastic nature of this Curtis fellow have > reminded me of the infinite patience and love Maharishi displayed. Just > imagine having to run an organization that even within it contained such hard > rocks of ignorgance and negativity ! > > That he simply didn't just give up and return to the Himalayas really tell > you something about the man. >
