--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptybill@...> wrote: > > So, looking back, what is your judgement of RWC's previous > claims to "enlightenment" and his current conversion to > Catholicism?
It's no longer "current," emptybill. He did convert, but he's said at least a dozen times here--including at least once directly to you, quite forcefully--that he's given up on Catholicism as well as TM. >From his post 295520, November 15: I appreciate the vehemence of your beliefs, emptybill. At least you are taking me seriously. but you must take me at my wordand I challenge you to find a single iota of proof to the contrary in all my posts at FFLthat I am not a Catholic*in any form whatsoever*. It may just be that my not defining myself as such, but alluding to Catholicism and Thomas Aquinas, has just about driven you out of your mind. WTF? This guy is bizarre. And you might have a point there, emptybill. But believe me I am sincere and only interested in strengthening my own understanding of what this is all about; I post on FFL in order to elicit just the kind of response that you have given to me here. Because I am thus forced back upon myself and have the opportunity to once again confirm what I know is the truth of my experience and my own philosophy. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/295520 And from a follow-up in response to your reply: For me, emptybill, it is as if there never was a God, never was the Incarnation, never was heaven or hell, never was sin and judgment and grace and Mary and the sacraments and the salvation of the soul. Those are just two examples of *many*.
