-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@...> wrote: > R ( snip)comes to mind. : )
Excellent point. Everything I said is for people who abide by the basics of the social contract and are not being malicious or going beyond the boundaries of whatever context they are in. (like the rules of this forum) And it is with such people that we find our ideals for freedom challenged. But up to that point I'd say the more diverse the merrier. And that certainly doesn't limit a person having preferences. But your point is important, there might be someone reading what I wrote and think it applied to people attempting to do harm, and that would be wrong. I guess I usually assume that posters here, with their long practice of the most powerful technique for developing mental potential (yea TM!) would not be that stupid. But your point is well taken, there might actually be someone that dim. Who knows how dim they would have been without TM huh? Oh and thanks for your kind concern, my name maliciously connected with slander has dropped below the top 10 of Google now that the proper boundaries for protecting posters here was applied, so time will heal this wound and I appreciate your sensitivity in this matter. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > The world would be the better place! > > > > First I don't "cavil" you. I point out your elitist triumphalism as a > > response to your expressions of it. > > > > Second, your "better world" involves more people who think as you do. That > > is the exact opposite of the world I enjoy just as it is. > > > <snip>
