>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Nay, no, that is not true you guys, you cavil me. Turqb a CurtisDb you
> > > > got me wrong.
> > > > We'd be nothing without each other here. I have nothing but goodwill
> > > > towards everyone here.
> > > >
> > > > Image two guys between meditation here (a laborer on the one hand and
> > > > an intellectual on the other) coming out of Revelations Café in
> > > > Fairfield crossing over to Paradiso Cafe arm-in-arm (may be it's even
> > > > Buck and Turqb) shouting to themselves, chanting to one another in
> > > > brotherly love,
> > > >
> > > > Om ! May the Unified Field protect us both together;
> > > > may It nourish us both together;
> > > > May we work conjointly with great energy,
> > > > May our study be vigorous and effective;
> > > > May we not mutually dispute
> > > > May we not hate any.
> > > >
> > > > The world would be the better place!
> > > >
> > > > -Buck
> > > >
> > >
> > > Of course, this image would mean that Hell had just froze over
> > > considering that Turqb declines ever to come back to be with
> > > meditative Fairfield. But Om, the image gives hope. And just seeing
> > > it in mind brings some tears to mine eyes.
> > >
> >
> > Think now just how many grown old sons and daughters of meditation gone
> > away like Turq and CurtisDb are wandering out there to come back! The
> > prodigal children of TM. If they'd only come home. They should be
> > beautiful when they'd come back and could get in to the domes, if they can.
> >
> >
>
> So my prayer is always and for whoever they be for the spiritual in
> everyone, "Om ! May the Unified Field protect us both together;". Yes it's a
> slog and difficult uphill climb for some, and some have even fallen down
> along the way. We can't deny that.
>
>
But I have hope for even better days with larger numbers again coming to
meditation here, as the principle of The second element bringing Light to the
subject. That is my experience with It. This is our fight here. To establish
one code Universal, the physics of natural law in the Unified Field, come live
it and enjoy It! Come to meditation. Don't let any negativity get in the way
of It. Cast away your negative thinking and our bickering. We'll be nothing
without each other here. We fight for the universal rights of human kind. We
live to have one universal code of experience here on FFL and everywhere.
With Great Love,
-Buck in FF
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I was mulling over a few versions of this post myself Barry, but
> > > > > since you nailed it I can get off with just a:
> > > > >
> > > > > what he said.
> > > > >
> > > > > Favorite line:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Call the media. "Buck" has just suggested that Fairfield
> > > > > > Life be run the way the TMO is. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You know, the TM Hymn on Negativity
> > > > > > > I should think it would make a nice unified code of conduct
> > > > > > > as an inclusive guideline for posting on FairfieldLife.
> > > > > > > Particularly for posting negativity here on FFL.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We'll miss you. :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Seriously, dude, what would you call all your endless
> > > > > > posts denouncing Bevan and the Rajas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Negative" is a RELATIVE concept, not an absolute
> > > > > > one. I'd be willing to bet that any of the people you
> > > > > > rail against would consider you and your "Buck" char-
> > > > > > acter more than a little negative. And, from their
> > > > > > point of view, they'd be correct, because to them
> > > > > > "negative" means anything that criticizes or goes
> > > > > > against what they believe to be true and correct.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I thought that earlier you yourself were making the
> > > > > > point that the injunction to "never entertain nega-
> > > > > > tivity and never denounce anyone" was a two-edged
> > > > > > sword that could be (and, as I remember you suggest-
> > > > > > ing, was) used by the TMO to control minds and
> > > > > > opinions. I agree with that earlier assessment, and
> > > > > > feel that what you propose above is just another
> > > > > > flavor of it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who gets to decide what is "negative" and what is not?
> > > > > > You? The mysterious "we" you refer to below? Not. Gonna.
> > > > > > Happen. :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You know, posting on FFL is a privilege, not a right. We
> > > > > > > should do more to protect that privilege. This is a simple
> > > > > > > guideline that is very easily enforced. Coulld just revoke
> > > > > > > someone's FFL membership when they violate it. For being
> > > > > > > negative like that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Call the media. "Buck" has just suggested that Fairfield
> > > > > > Life be run the way the TMO is. :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Have it on the homepage as part of the forum description so
> > > > > > > it comes up every time. It's a uniform code of justice to
> > > > > > > attend to that we could all use and our moderators enforce.
> > > > > > > We'd all be better off and the list a safer place to be.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can think of no place on earth that would be a safer
> > > > > > place to be with someone of the "Buck" mindset running it.
> > > > > > Just sayin'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Om ! May the Unified Field protect us both together;
> > > > > > > may It nourish us both together;
> > > > > > > May we work conjointly with great energy,
> > > > > > > May our study be vigorous and effective;
> > > > > > > May we not mutually dispute
> > > > > > > or may we not hate any.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I kind of suspected you'd come up with the more correct
> > > > > > > > translation of that hymn. Thanks Cardm,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Om ! May the Unified Field protect us both together;
> > > > > > > > may It nourish us both together;
> > > > > > > > May we work conjointly with great energy,
> > > > > > > > May our study be vigorous and effective;
> > > > > > > > May we not mutually dispute
> > > > may we not hate any.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
> > > > > > > > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
> > > > > > > > > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Jeezus X-mas, they've been chanting it wrong all
> > > > > > > > > > > > this time!
> > > > > > > > > > > > Well then, no wonder.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > saha nau avatu .
> > > > > > > > > > > > saha nau bhunaktu .
> > > > > > > > > > > > saha viiryaM karavaavahai .
> > > > > > > > > > > > tejasvi nau;
> > > > > > > > > > > > adhiitam astu maa vidviSaavahai .
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > That's pada-paaTha (word-reading), so to speak.
> > > > > > > > > > > The saMhitaa-paaTha goes like this:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > saha naav avatu . saha nau bhunaktu . saha viiryaM
> > > > > > > > > > > karavaavahai .
> > > > > > > > > > > tejasvi naav adhiitam astu maa vidviSaavahai .
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > That is, before a *vowel*, 'nau' changes to 'naav',
> > > > > > > > > > > without any effect on the *semantic* level.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This seems to be the most accurate translation I could
> > > > > > > > > > find quickly:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Om ! May He protect us both together; may He nourish us
> > > > > > > > > > both together;
> > > > > > > > > > May we work conjointly with great energy,
> > > > > > > > > > May our study be vigorous and effective;
> > > > > > > > > > May we not mutually dispute (or may we not hate any).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oh, so that's the correct translation. For us meditators
> > > > > > > > > here, it reads really well substituting in `Unified Field.
> > > > > > > > > It's beautiful even if it is not the way Maharishi and Bevan
> > > > > > > > > used it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Om ! May the Unified Field protect us both together;
> > > > > > > > > may It nourish us both together;
> > > > > > > > > May we work conjointly with great energy,
> > > > > > > > > May our study be vigorous and effective;
> > > > > > > > > May we not mutually dispute (or may we not hate any).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > May He protect (avatu) us both (nau [~now] accusative
> > > > > > > > > > *dual*) together (saha);
> > > > > > > > > > may He nourish (bhunaktu) us both (nau) together (saha);
> > > > > > > > > > May we work (karavaavahai) conjointly (saha)
> > > > > > > > > > with great energy (viiryam),
> > > > > > > > > > May our study be (adhiitam [study] astu [may (it) be])
> > > > > > > > > > vigorous-and-effective (tejasvi);
> > > > > > > > > > May we not (maa: 'we' in the verb ->) mutually-dispute
> > > > > > > > > > (vidviSaavahai)
> > > > > > > > > > (or may we not hate any: vidviSaavahai).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
