http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
Many people, though far fewer than still needed to put to rest moral judgments of purely natural behavior, believe and feel that homosexual orientation is just what some percentage of any population feels. It has no moral significance whatsoever for lots and lots of folks. Your argument appears to be that people who are homosexual should adopt your moral interpretation and then feel bad about themselves. Just imagine for a moment, if you will, your worst fears realized and a now majority empowered gay society really *did* want to impose their homosexual values and orientation on you. Telling you that it was evil and wrong to feel the way you do about members of the opposite sex. Wouldn't that seem wrong? Isn't your sexual attraction towards others (or lack thereof) just a fundamental element of your personhood? The "homesexuality is unnatural" argument carries no weight as evidenced in the science of simple observation of all the examples in nature. *** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@> wrote: > > > > > Like duh...could you elaborate?, I think the > > > Rauch has blown his wad, but there may be other good rebuttals.. > > > > > Maybe if you asked without such an agenda behind it, you could have > > gotten a response. I would have liked to hear what Raunchy had to say. > > > > Let me take a shot at it. We know that everyone one of us has a sex > > drive, that needs to be satisfied. And if your attraction is towards > > the same sex, then I guess that is how you are going to go about > > satisfying it. > > > > I gather that your objection to this is that one is proscribed from > > doing so by the Bible. But maybe one is not so much the religious type. > > Or perhaps more likely, ones sex drive trumps a religous proscription. > > So, you are faced with trading one dysfunction for another. > > > > Your solution, I gather, is some sort of therapy to correct the "mixup", > > with a religious dicatate as a backdrop. From what I hear, that doesn't > > seem to work in most cases. > > > > I will say that the whole process seems to work better, or at least more > > easily, (see naturally) between a man and women, but work arounds are > > pretty easy. > > > > I remember it was somewhat a mild shock when a prominient interior > > decorator was giving us a tour of his condominium, and showed us the > > elaborate bedroom he shared with Vince, his partner. It just sort of > > took me aback, not in judgemental way, but more in a rather humurous > > way. I mean, this was one well furnished and delicately appointed > > bedroom. > > There is NO such thing as GAY, God did not create men OR woman GAY, they made > that choice themselves at some point in the past in this life or previous > ones, it's that simple. > > One will naturally fall into harmony with Natural Law by practicing > Religious/Spiritual principles like meditation and scripture. We need to > learn the lessons of the past or we are forced to repeat them, as you well > know. >
