--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" <reavismarek@...> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior > > Many people, though far fewer than still needed to put to rest moral > judgments of purely natural behavior, believe and feel that homosexual > orientation is just what some percentage of any population feels. It has no > moral significance whatsoever for lots and lots of folks. > > Your argument appears to be that people who are homosexual should adopt your > moral interpretation and then feel bad about themselves. Just imagine for a > moment, if you will, your worst fears realized and a now majority empowered > gay society really *did* want to impose their homosexual values and > orientation on you. Telling you that it was evil and wrong to feel the way > you do about members of the opposite sex. Wouldn't that seem wrong? Isn't > your sexual attraction towards others (or lack thereof) just a fundamental > element of your personhood? > > The "homesexuality is unnatural" argument carries no weight as evidenced in > the science of simple observation of all the examples in nature. >
Excellent post, marekreavis. Billy will never understanding why homosexuals penguins don't adopt *his* moral interpretation according *his* Bible. Nice try though. http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/404343/december-14-2011/stephen-colbert-s-big-gay-roundup---military-bestiality---homosexual-penguins > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@> wrote: > > > > > > > Like duh...could you elaborate?, I think the > > > > Rauch has blown his wad, but there may be other good rebuttals.. > > > > > > > Maybe if you asked without such an agenda behind it, you could have > > > gotten a response. I would have liked to hear what Raunchy had to say. > > > > > > Let me take a shot at it. We know that everyone one of us has a sex > > > drive, that needs to be satisfied. And if your attraction is towards > > > the same sex, then I guess that is how you are going to go about > > > satisfying it. > > > > > > I gather that your objection to this is that one is proscribed from > > > doing so by the Bible. But maybe one is not so much the religious type. > > > Or perhaps more likely, ones sex drive trumps a religous proscription. > > > So, you are faced with trading one dysfunction for another. > > > > > > Your solution, I gather, is some sort of therapy to correct the "mixup", > > > with a religious dicatate as a backdrop. From what I hear, that doesn't > > > seem to work in most cases. > > > > > > I will say that the whole process seems to work better, or at least more > > > easily, (see naturally) between a man and women, but work arounds are > > > pretty easy. > > > > > > I remember it was somewhat a mild shock when a prominient interior > > > decorator was giving us a tour of his condominium, and showed us the > > > elaborate bedroom he shared with Vince, his partner. It just sort of > > > took me aback, not in judgemental way, but more in a rather humurous > > > way. I mean, this was one well furnished and delicately appointed > > > bedroom. > > > > There is NO such thing as GAY, God did not create men OR woman GAY, they > > made that choice themselves at some point in the past in this life or > > previous ones, it's that simple. > > > > One will naturally fall into harmony with Natural Law by practicing > > Religious/Spiritual principles like meditation and scripture. We need to > > learn the lessons of the past or we are forced to repeat them, as you well > > know. > > >
