--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" <reavismarek@...> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior > > Many people, though far fewer than still needed to put to rest moral > judgments of purely natural behavior, believe and feel that homosexual > orientation is just what some percentage of any population feels. It has no > moral significance whatsoever for lots and lots of folks. > > Your argument appears to be that people who are homosexual should adopt your > moral interpretation and then feel bad about themselves. Just imagine for a > moment, if you will, your worst fears realized and a now majority empowered > gay society really *did* want to impose their homosexual values and > orientation on you. Telling you that it was evil and wrong to feel the way > you do about members of the opposite sex. Wouldn't that seem wrong? Isn't > your sexual attraction towards others (or lack thereof) just a fundamental > element of your personhood? > > The "homesexuality is unnatural" argument carries no weight as evidenced in > the science of simple observation of all the examples in nature.
One is in harmony with Natural Law and one isn't, "the moon is not disturbed by the baying of wolves", the truth will always remain the same, it's just up to us to discover what this truth is.
