--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shainm307" <shainm307@...> wrote: > > What I've found in this reading is there are two types of people in the > world:the people who try to help the world and the people who try to fuck the > world. However some of you are positive in your motives for standing up for > what is apparently and obviously right. I mean I try to stand up for what is > right for the world because it is the best thing I can possibly do for > people. However no matter how much evidence there is behind a topic people > will deliberately try to fuck it just for a negative reason because the world > possibly couldn't exist with something completely positive in it. It has to > be wrong or negative to be right. I highly doubt this is the case in the > world. Look at all the positives behind TM and what it has done for the > world, yet people will try to tear it down for no apparent reason. Why? If > everyone got together and tried to figure out what is good with it, it > wouldn't work because some people would just be way too negative to ever > believe it. If the negative people are out to fuck things what are they out > to fuck? A small distortion in the knowledge? I imagine the best thing for us > all to do is "give in" to positivity. I mean what is better than TM? Nothing > in my mind. We have to do something right, not just tear it all down. If you > want to tear this down, why? What is better than TM? Personally I think > people are trying to find that one thing that exists in reality: the > nonexstience, as I think technically everything is not right with the world. > Do you want to find the small things that are wrong with it, or do you want > to find the things that are right with it? >
Just my tupenniheipni: I believe e.g. most Caucasians have a rather strong(?) version of the so called adventure gene, or whatevah. That's prolly the main reason why their ancestors left Africa in the first place. That might be one of the reasons most people are "afraid" of the Age of Enlightenment, because they prolly think, at least subconsciously, there would be no challenge and adventure during a "Golden Age"??
