This would be funny if it weren't so sad. Curtis is being pummeled because he has requested that Robin not make false quotes that are attributable to Curtis.
Here we are on the playground. Robin steals Curtis' lunch. Curtis objects. Robin: "I never heard you say you wanted that lunch" Curtis: "Well I just assumed....." Robin: "Assumed what? How do I know you wanted to eat your lunch if you didn't say so? Curtis: "Normally I just eat my own lunch. Isn't that how it works?" Judy rambling up: "Yea, I didn't hear you say you wanted to eat your lunch. That makes it fair game. If you want your lunch, let's hear why. And it better be good" Robin: "Come on Judy. You eat the PP@J <mailto:PP@J> , and I'll eat the Snickers bar and the jello" And off they go into the distance with Curtis' lunch --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Curtis, > > > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent > > > your voice, and specify which passages in either post you > > > feel are untruthful; that is, you would not say what I have > > > you saying. "There were many statements in what you wrote > > > that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated". If > > > there are such statements, this tends to defeat my argument. > > > I would like some examples. > > > > I only read the last one, I couldn't find the first one. And > > no I don't need to go over the post to prove to you it doesn't > > represent my POV. > > You sure as hell do if you want to make a case for the > assertion Robin quotes, Curtis. > > You won't because you can't. > > Here's the first one, by the way: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319527 >
