--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > Well I SUGGESTED moving to Wednesday. Some agreed. Some > > didn't. > > And some didn't like the idea of reserving *any* day > for this "special" use. > > > I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next > > week. > > > > I like the FFL variety too. I think Marek was suggesting > > something other than less variety. > > I don't believe anyone said Marek was suggesting less > variety, do you, Share? > > I guess you must have misunderstood. The point is that > the *result* of Marek's suggestion would be less variety > day to day, because if there were a "special" day every > week designated for "creative" posts or neat finds, > folks would tend to save them up so they would have > something to contribute on that day. As a consequence, > such posts would no longer be sprinkled as freely > throughout the week as they are now.
Judy, you need to re-read Marek's original suggestion because you have *completely* misunderstood his intentions. The *result* of Marek's suggestion would be less negativity through arguing, correcting, etc. etc. for at least one day each week so that some people might actually want to visit and read some of the posts on that particular day. Leave it to you to twist it into something else. Feel free to contribute something on Wednesdays if you wish, or sprinkle it throughout the week. You have my permission. And if you insist on misrepresenting Marek's noble suggestion, I just might have to come ot NJ and spank you! > > One of the things that's so nice about this kind of > forum is the spontaneity. I understand that some folks > find this threatening (it's why we have a posting > limit, by the way). They'd rather have everything all > laid out and planned so they know what to expect. > > Once you start designating "special" days for this and > days for that, however, you really end up with a > different type of forum altogether. Nothing wrong with > it, but it's not what many folks here are interested in. > > Say, Share, when are you going to acknowledge all the > mistakes you made in our exchange a few weeks ago? I > mean, you just pointed out my terrible blooper about > who first mentioned the Hatfields and McCoys, you or > Ann, and demanded that I acknowledge it--which I did > immediately. > > I think it's about time you acknowledge yours, don't > you? >
