--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote:
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What was uncomfortable for you about making eye contact,
> > > > > > Share?
> > > > > 
> > > > > When I was in India with the Vedic Atom, there was a troop of baboons 
> > > > > that roamed freely at the walled boundary of a large park. After 
> > > > > lunch we often walked to the park from the nearby Indian Express 
> > > > > Building where we met for rounding and Maharishi's lectures. One day 
> > > > > I made the mistake of making eye contact with a large male baboon. He 
> > > > > charged at me. I turned tail and ran like hell. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Eye contact is an intimacy that could feel like a threatening 
> > > > > invasion of personal space for people as well as baboons. Prolonged 
> > > > > eye contact is usually reserved for a lover for the purpose of 
> > > > > bonding and intimacy. Intense, prolonged eye contact with people you 
> > > > > may not know very well in a workshop seems like an artificial 
> > > > > intimacy that could be uncomfortable for some folks. Apparently, it 
> > > > > challenges a person's tolerance for intimacy, but then, that's 
> > > > > probably the purpose of the gazing exercise. As long as it's not with 
> > > > > a baboon, gazing would be just fine by me.
> > > > 
> > > > I've never done this, but as I try to imagine it, it
> > > > doesn't seem as if it would be uncomfortable. Maybe
> > > > it would in reality.
> > > > 
> > > > If it *isn't* uncomfortable--if it's not challenging
> > > > for a person--I wonder what they would gain from it.
> > > 
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/55423
> > > 
> > > "There are some traditions that explain this phenomenon
> > >  in terms of "recognition." You sit in the presence of
> > >  someone who is "firing on more cylinders" than you are.
> > >  They are "higher," or in a more advanced state of con-
> > >  sciousness. More aspects of their being have "woken up."
> > >  And in that person's presence, you find that similar
> > >  aspects of YOUR being "wake up.""
> > > 
> > > In WD, gazing isn't about being a challenge. It's spoken of in terms of 
> > > transmission, but IMO, it's exactly what Barry refers to in that post. 
> > > It's an opportunity bring yourself into spiritual alignment with the 
> > > teacher by simply being present with each other in a very powerful way.
> > 
> > Thanks for the explanation, Alex. I was just guessing what WD "gazing" is 
> > all about based on my experience with people and a baboon...so what do I 
> > know?
> 
> FWIW, Share says "everybody does it with everybody" now; it's
> not just teacher-and-student.

Peer gazing, as they call it, was just beginning to be done when I stopped 
going to WD sittings. And, IIRC, here in FF, it was only being done at one of 
the teacher's sittings. I don't know how much peer gazing is done these days 
because I drifted away from WD a few years ago.

Reply via email to