--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, oxcart49 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote: > > > > --- "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > His philosophy is his own, not "borrowed," first of all, as > > > Barry would know if he'd been reading Robin's posts. Second, > > > given that he has concluded Maharishi was fundamentally a > > > fraud-- > > > > > > "Objectively, I have have been forced to conclude that Maharishi > > > did not possess either the personal or even impersonal integrity > > > to justify what he claimed to be and what he claimed as his > > > purpose in this life." > > > > > > --how would this "butter up" TMers? > > > > Could it be that Robin suffers from a disconnect between his > > emotional relationship with Maharishi and his intellectual > > relationship with Maharishi? > > > > If Maharishi is a fraud and he still loves this fraud and > > has fond memories of this fraud? > > > > That means Robin is in the same boat as Barry who has fond > > memories of this 'Cheater cunt Rama' and brags over and over > > again about how much he benefited from him. > > > > Think about it authbabe. > > Interesting way to address her, I don't think I've seen this > one yet. > > > Maybe you too have this disconnect. > > I think Judy mostly states the facts. Her "disconnect"(s), > foibles and personal hangups don't really seem to be at > the forefront of what she writes. Often she points out > mistakes, factual errors, timeline faults. Frequently the > recipient of these corrections doesn't like it and accuses > her of this and that. But if you really look she doesn't > seem to have any personal agendas or real vendettas going > on (although some are certainly the target of her > unwavering attention). In some ways I see her as the > conscience we should all possess but, for various reasons > at times, don't. Of course Barry and Curtis would disagree > mightily with this assessment.
Thank you, oxcart. I'm honestly not sure what Jason is referring to. I never had an "emotional relationship" with Maharishi, was never even in his presence.
