Interesting how all the women are going for poor Share's throat: authfriend, Dog, Wolf, Emily. None of the men are. I wonder why this should be. Obviously, authfriend and Dog feel the need to defend their beloved former cult leader, whereas Wolf and Emily just seem to be spoiling for a fight. Women are very curious creatures. I do not understand them at all. But one thing is sure: you don't want to piss them off.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > Share replying to Ann's recent posts to Xeno and laughinggull: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > I'm not Share but I think it is rude to talk about > > someone as if they aren't already standing in the same room with you. > > > > Share:� I assure you Ann, no one on FFL is standing in my FF living room > > with me at this moment!� More relevantly, at this moment I don't know > > who is online, so don't even know who is in the CHAT ROOM with me right > > now.� Sometimes when it seems appropriate I address people directly as > > I'm doing now with you though I'm guessing that you're not yet online > > this morning.� There have been a few times recently when it's been > > appropriate to address Robin directly as when I replied to his reply to > > Bill's book.� Other > > times I reply to other individuals or to FFL as a whole especially in > > the case where Robin seems to be taking a break and I have something to > > say.� Especially something to say to address the various accusations and > > insinuations about me. > > More importantly, since the first upset with Robin on Sept 6, I have asked > > him if we could work out our misunderstandings offline. At that time, > > twice he brought our exchanges back online. And it seems that he > > continues to prefer that format through all the upsets that have occurred > > since > > then.� So be it.� I was willing to discuss the psychological rape topic > > offline. I've been willing to discuss the CULT issues offline.� But if > > Robin prefers to discuss these matters online, and if I wish to address > > public accusations and insinuations about me, then the best option I see is > > to reply > > online. > > > > Well Share, considering the convoluted discussions, often confusing, > downright misleading, and negative, intentionally hurtful things you've had > to say about Robin online for all to see, (I'm certain Judy could provide > links supporting my assertions) maybe Robin's decision to talk to you online > was correct. It seems to me he may have intuited a tendency of stalking > behavior on your part and wanted to nip in the bud perhaps a fledgling love > interest, which he had no intention of encouraging. Your continued interest > in him under the guise of "helping" him, help only his detractors think he > needs, and continuing to press your case of psychological rape, an utterly > bogus fantasy, is IMO simply deluded stalking as evidenced by your "actions." > Maybe it's time for a vacation from FFLife to heal your attachment to Robin. > > > In another post: > > laughinggull wrote:� Anyway, that's why I think that none of us can say > > that the Robin > > of today is the same as the Robin of long ago, because we have no basis > > on which to make that judgment without being around him physically for a > > reasonable amount of time to witness what I think of as true *actions* > > with all the accompanying nuances, body language, etc. etc. And besides, > > who can say that Robin isn't laughing his ass off or doesn't have his > > tongue firmly planted in his cheek as he types his comments here at > > FFL...maybe he's just having a little fun at our expense. > > > > Ann replied: I agree that close physical proximity to anyone is the only > > way to go if > > you want to really get to know them. The nuances just can't be beat if > > you want the real goods on someone. Just like my horse, I need to hear > > them, (smell them!) and watch every little move they make to come to > > understand more of what is going on in their person(hood). And this on > > top of hearing what they have to say, in person > > > > Share:� So on what close physical proximity to Robin are you basing what > > you say in the post BELOW?� That which occurred 25 years ago?� Or your > > current cyber interactions?� Especially that part about his being a > > regular grunt like the rest of us, on what are you basing that?� Even > > from his most recent posts I'd say Robin is something other than a regular > > grunt.� I'm sure his day to day life has its regular aspects.� And I > > too see his regular humanity.� However, based on his exchanges here I see > > more than regular grunt.� > > > > Robin is more than a regular grunt, fer sure. > http://youtu.be/c55ybIOGEeU > > > In addition, I'd guess that as a mature man, Robin's also aiming to help > > ease the load of others and love and cherish them, not only to be eased and > > loved and cherished.� Sometimes IMO Robin's supporters reply as if he's a > > helpless little boy.� > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:15 PM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: attempting to heal the brain down through the > > ages > > > > > >  > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > And as for Robin, he is just a man. He is someone who has struggled and > > continues to struggle with the challenges life chucks his direction. But I > > think he is doing his best; I do not think he lives without emotion, fear, > > attachment, doubts, moments of joy, the ability to discriminate. In other > > words, he is a regular grunt like the rest of us, stumbling his way through > > his years on this planet and > > he yearns for something that will eventually ease the load and confirm he > > is a soul who is loved and cherished. > > > > > > > > > >
