--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@> > wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > > wrote: > > > > > Steve *feels* Ann is a little off. He wants to apply Robin's > > > reality template to her but astonishingly, he hasn't a clue > > > how to apply Robin's reality template to *himself*. Steve's > > > bright idea to apply Robin's Reality Template to Ann ranks > > > in the top ten for "Most Ridiculous Shit Steve Has Ever Said." > > I would agree, but only because mentioning the words > "reality" and "Robin" in the same sentence is ridiculous, > much less implying that the latter could come up with any > kind of "template" for the former. :-) > > I've never encountered *anyone* with less of a grasp on > what most people would call "reality" than Robin. > > > > Steve can't put his finger on why Ann's posts mostly miss > > > the target. But that's not surprising. He has yet to put his > > > finger on why *he* has become a target for ridicule. He could > > > give concrete examples of Ann missing the mark but he won't > > > because there are no such examples and as usual he's too > > > fucking lazy to search the archives. > > In other words, Raunchy wants Steve to act like an > obsessed, vindictive old woman...like herself and > Judy. She's just described, after all, what *they* > do on this forum, and berated him for not acting > like them. > > > > He says whatever irresponsible shit he *feels* as if it's > > > true without offering a shred of proof and then remains, > > > stubbornly, stupidly clueless as to why anyone would ask > > > him to be accountable for the shit he flings around > > > FFLife. > > Perhaps he feels as I do, that there is no one on FFL > who has the RIGHT to "hold anyone else accountable," > for anything. Perhaps he also feels that trying to > "prove" something to others is a waste of time when > dealing with normal people, and a *total* waste of > time when dealing with idiots. > > > Raunch, > > > > When it's all said and done, I think they can say about you: > > > > Her blind spots were immense. She was reduced to a babbling > > idiot when asked to explain the sexism and corruption in the > > TMO, and the hypocrisy of her best friends, but she could > > always be relied upon dish up a decent insult when called upon. > > > > I think that about sums it up. > > Yup. One of the prime contenders for Hypocrisy Queen > Of The Year. > Shit Barry Says: When others criticize my opinions, they have no right to hold me accountable. When I criticize others, I'm not holding them accountable. It's just my opinion. I am not a hypocrite. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > > wrote: > > > > > Steve *feels* Ann is a little off. He wants to apply Robin's > > > reality template to her but astonishingly, he hasn't a clue > > > how to apply Robin's reality template to *himself*. Steve's > > > bright idea to apply Robin's Reality Template to Ann ranks > > > in the top ten for "Most Ridiculous Shit Steve Has Ever Said." > > I would agree, but only because mentioning the words > "reality" and "Robin" in the same sentence is ridiculous, > much less implying that the latter could come up with any > kind of "template" for the former. :-) > > I've never encountered *anyone* with less of a grasp on > what most people would call "reality" than Robin. > > > > Steve can't put his finger on why Ann's posts mostly miss > > > the target. But that's not surprising. He has yet to put his > > > finger on why *he* has become a target for ridicule. He could > > > give concrete examples of Ann missing the mark but he won't > > > because there are no such examples and as usual he's too > > > fucking lazy to search the archives. > > In other words, Raunchy wants Steve to act like an > obsessed, vindictive old woman...like herself and > Judy. She's just described, after all, what *they* > do on this forum, and berated him for not acting > like them. > > > > He says whatever irresponsible shit he *feels* as if it's > > > true without offering a shred of proof and then remains, > > > stubbornly, stupidly clueless as to why anyone would ask > > > him to be accountable for the shit he flings around > > > FFLife. > > Perhaps he feels as I do, that there is no one on FFL > who has the RIGHT to "hold anyone else accountable," > for anything. Perhaps he also feels that trying to > "prove" something to others is a waste of time when > dealing with normal people, and a *total* waste of > time when dealing with idiots. > > > Raunch, > > > > When it's all said and done, I think they can say about you: > > > > Her blind spots were immense. She was reduced to a babbling > > idiot when asked to explain the sexism and corruption in the > > TMO, and the hypocrisy of her best friends, but she could > > always be relied upon dish up a decent insult when called upon. > > > > I think that about sums it up. > > Yup. One of the prime contenders for Hypocrisy Queen > Of The Year. >
