--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> >
> > My feeling about "living in the moment" is that it's not 
> > all that it's cracked up to be. It is a New Age cliche 
> > and refers to something for which human beings are not 
> > designed. We live simultaneously in past, present, and 
> > future. That's our nature. It is a quintessential human 
> > act to think back to the past, and constantly interpret 
> > and reinterpret it for ourselves, and we also are wired 
> > to spend a lot of time envisaging the future, for better 
> > or worse. My cat can do neither of those things. He is 
> > pretty good at living in the moment, but I have no desire 
> > to emulate him. 
> 
> Well said, but the issue to me seems to revolve more 
> around which species have the ability to *not* submit
> to the pressures of past, present, and future when 
> dealing with present events, not the tendency to do so.
> 
> That issue brings up the issue of free will, and of 
> being capable of influencing one's passage through 
> time and space. Is one a "prisoner" of one's previous
> passages through time and space, or merely influenced
> by them?
> 
> I'm going to go for the latter. The samskaras are 
> present, *in* the present. The compulsion to submit
> to them and keep doing the same old same old is not. 
> 
> Not for human beings, anyway. I can't speak for your
> cat.  :-)


I would like to think you are right, but I can't say that I feel free of those 
old ghosts that loiter in the psyche. I tend to agree with Faulkner, "The past 
is never dead. It is not even past." 


> 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Goodness Ann, you are hysterically funny.  I am creepily connected to 
> > > you.  "If I were a man, I'd want to be me."  Ahh ha ha ha ha ha. 
> > >  Those lines were priceless.  I did look up Camille Claudel.  I 
> > > wouldn't want to be her - poor woman - her mother refused to let her out 
> > > of the asylum. 
> > > 
> > > O.K.  Now I will go for the day (promise - I feel so guilty for posting 
> > > so much) and come back to listen.  I have to look up Robin's past posts 
> > > on "grace."  My memory sucks with all this living in the moment crap. 
> > >  Maybe I'll use the advanced search on that.  And I want to find those 
> > > pictures of penguins to show Share how supportive I feel towards her in 
> > > Reality.  Love ya, Ann.  Sincerely, Emily.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >________________________________
> > > > From: awoelflebater <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > >Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 10:12 AM
> > > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is worse,,,"really stupid" or "reeely 
> > > >stooopid"
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> 
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> 
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > dear FFL, just to set the record straight:  I don't even THINK 
> > > >> > > the word imbecile much less express it.  Emily recently asked a 
> > > >> > > question about TM and I followed up with a similar question to 
> > > >> > > Steve.  Not sure how my asking a question of Steve is saying 
> > > >> > > anything at all about Emily.  And it's true that I ONCE called 
> > > >> > > Emily's sense of humor creepy.  She is the person who is 
> > > >> > > multiplying it.  
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > In this post of hers it is the indirectly attributing to me 
> > > >> > > something I did not say or even think, that is what I'd call 
> > > >> > > creepy here.
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Why this sudden animosity towards Emily? Steve and her can be 
> > > >> > friends too, you know. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> And why don't you just leave this be, Ann? I feel *your* animosity 
> > > >> here. 
> > > >
> > > >Yes, and I am ashamed and abject, right here and right in the 'now'. 
> > > >There is no escaping the 'fact' of my unwarranted attack on the one who 
> > > >is already persecuted mercilessly here. You were right in pointing this 
> > > >out, what else could you have done given your propensity for finding the 
> > > >truth and reality in all things? Please, please accept my most profound 
> > > >offering which is in the form of my regret in this matter. It won't 
> > > >happen again (well, maybe can I exempt Barry from this promise?).
> > > >
> > > >>There is someone who is being persecuted. Emily is only getting what 
> > > >>she deserves. 
> > > >
> > > >I know this now and stand humbly corrected. Emily you ARE a creep and 
> > > >creepy to boot.
> > > >
> > > >>If I were a woman I would want to be Camille Claudel. 
> > > >
> > > >And if Share were a man she wants to be Steve. If I were a man I'd want 
> > > >to be me.
> > > >
> > > >>Ravi was referring to Prince Myshkin--where Dostoyevsky's intent was to 
> > > >>create a character "entirely positive...with an absolutely beautiful 
> > > >>nature". I hope this once, the object of your gratuitous hatred can 
> > > >>resist the temptation to take it to you, Ann--because if she does this 
> > > >>once more--and you don't realize how ignominiously defeated you are, I 
> > > >>will have to send you (this time) into a virtual exile.
> > > >
> > > >Just try it, buster. But I agree, I will keep my head down because the 
> > > >fury of the onslaught could come from anywhere and I may not be up to 
> > > >the task of surviving. There are more than a few white knights here on 
> > > >this forum.
> > > >
> > > >> I am trying to do some good around here, Ann: please learn to whisper 
> > > >> more wisely to these other horses. 
> > > >
> > > >I'm doin' my best but sometimes those 'heehaws' just burst out of me and 
> > > >I'm just not sure where they come from. I could be the neuroplasticity 
> > > >talking but something tells me it's the devil in me. I think you may 
> > > >have been right about that.
> > > >> 
> > > >> > > BTW how I remember this sequence:  lines on stone, lines on 
> > > >> > > sand, lines on water, lines on air.  
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > ________________________________
> > > >> > >  From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@>
> > > >> > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
> > > >> > > <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > > >> > > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 11:45 PM
> > > >> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is worse,,,"really stupid" 
> > > >> > > or "reeely stooopid"
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > >   
> > > >> > > Steve:  I was being sincere - you really have been laying down 
> > > >> > > some funny stuff, IMO.   You are never the butt of my joke. 
> > > >> > >  I almost always laugh in the spirit of the moment and never 
> > > >> > > with mean intention - and I'm quite serious about that.  I 
> > > >> > > laugh at the human condition and our attempts to communicate with 
> > > >> > > each other and I do it so that I don't grieve too hard when things 
> > > >> > > are tough.  I should really get a volunteer position as I've 
> > > >> > > already filled out the application - I just have to make the call. 
> > > >> > >  
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > I don't always explain the way I interpret FFL and I probably 
> > > >> > > won't.  I run it through a lot of different filters some days. 
> > > >> > >  Which means that I "misinterpret" at times on purpose for a 
> > > >> > > different effect - easy to do with words on paper. And it is well 
> > > >> > > known now, thanks to Share, that I have a "creepy" sense of humor. 
> > > >> > >  And I am a TM imbecile.  
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > And I wasn't feeling particularly up today, if truth be told, so I 
> > > >> > > really appreciated your posts.  And, I love a good beer. 
> > > >> > >  Had to give it up when I was diagnosed as gluten intolerant, 
> > > >> > > but I'm going to cheat after what Emptybill posted today.   
> > > >> > > Emily
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > >________________________________
> > > >> > > > From: seventhray27 <steve.sundur@>
> > > >> > > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > >> > > >Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 6:04 PM
> > > >> > > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is worse,,,"really stupid" or 
> > > >> > > >"reeely stooopid"
> > > >> > > > 
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >  
> > > >> > > >whether Emily was being sincere or making fun of me, I really 
> > > >> > > >don't care.  If I can be the butt of her joke, so be it.
> > > >> > > >(and yes, I need to check out the link)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" 
> > > >> > > ><maskedzebra@> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> If you ever figure out why Emily is laughing, Steve, you'll be 
> > > >> > > >> where Ted wrote about sex with Sylvia.
> > > >> > > >> 
> > > >> > > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ 
> > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > Ahh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....ahhhhhh ha ha ha ha ha ha 
> > > >> > > >> > ah....ahhhhhhhhh ha ha ha ha ha. Steve, I don't know what is 
> > > >> > > >> > up for you, but you are really making me laugh these days. 
> > > >> > > >> >  Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.......
> > > >> > > >> > 
> > > >> > > >> > 
> > > >> > > >> > 
> > > >> > > >> > >________________________________
> > > >> > > >> > > From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@
> > > >> > > >> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > >> > > >> > >Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:18 PM
> > > >> > > >> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is worse,,,"really 
> > > >> > > >> > >stupid" or "reeely stooopid"
> > > >> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >  
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" 
> > > >> > > >> > ><maskedzebra@> wrote:
> > > >> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > >> > >> 
> > > >> > > >> > >> 
> > > >> > > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" 
> > > >> > > >> > >> steve.sundur@ wrote:
> > > >> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > >> You always read me perfectly, Steve, and I am loving it. 
> > > >> > > >> > >> And you have been more merciful than most here--I don't 
> > > >> > > >> > >> like people criticizing me--but you, you say something 
> > > >> > > >> > >> nice when you do this (put me in a better place). And 
> > > >> > > >> > >> believe me, Steve: this makes all the difference.
> > > >> > > >> > >> 
> > > >> > > >> > >> I am trying to 'get' your philosophy; I think you are 
> > > >> > > >> > >> trying to teach it to me indirectly--through anecdotes 
> > > >> > > >> > >> like the ones in this post. I think this an efficacious 
> > > >> > > >> > >> way to get your wisdom to go right into me, Steve.
> > > >> > > >> > >> 
> > > >> > > >> > >> I will let you know (through my deeds) the progress I am
> > > >> > >  making. Don't ever give up on me. I need your help--AND your love.
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > > Make a daily journal.  We'll call it 
> > > >> > > >> > >"Robin's Daily Journal".  Make a list of the things 
> > > >> > > >> > >you hope to accomplish in a given day, and maybe some 
> > > >> > > >> > >personality traits to which you want to pay a little closer 
> > > >> > > >> > >attention.  And then at the end of the day, you can 
> > > >> > > >> > >write about how you feel you did.  
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >For example, "Was I too aggressive applying 
> > > >> > > >> > >my First Person Ontology test to those I interacted with?" 
> > > >> > > >> > > Or, "Was my irony appropriate, or 
> > > >> > > >> > >insincere".  These might be some areas to consider. 
> > > >> > > >> > > I really don't know.  I am just throwing 
> > > >> > > >> > >them out for suggestions.  
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >We're here for you Robin. We can get through this.
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >> We are good now, I think,
> > > >> > >  Steve.
> > > >> > > >> > >> 
> > > >> > > >> > >> Robin 
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to