Smelly fingers! "Do you have a mint?" hahahahaha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> >
> > You, and Raunchy have missed the point, sorry to say. :-( Barry has by his
> > own admission, moved waaaaaay beyond the sorry meditations and siddhi
> > techniques associated with Maharishi and the TMO. Even those professed by
> > the yogi mentioned in the original article.
> >
> > Barry can not only lock air behind his anus, he can *speak* with it. It was
> > this advanced siddhi that he hints to, with every post here, thinking
> > somewhat smugly to himself, "...you mortals must speak with your mouths,
> > while I, progeny of Rama, ONLY talk out of my ass...".
> >
> > Far from the airy fairy claims made by the TMO for example, with the
> > so-called "flying" siddhi, where nothing seems to materialize as described,
> > Barry can manifest the siddhi [of anal speech] at will. It is said by some
> > of his most ardent followers that this THE ONLY MEANS by which he
> > communicates!
> >
> > So, take heed, we have a GREAT ONE in our midst. Though I personally would
> > like to see a bit more humility from so great a personage, I can better
> > understand the arrogance of Barry. Think of it, lost within a race of the
> > un-evolved, the dark, the ignorant, everyone speaking, using their (ugh)
> > LIPS, when Barry effortlessly speaks from his BUTT.
> >
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DrRE1LDY_U
>
> > What a gap in evolution, between us commoners, and HIM. Deep Bow.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > You can always tell when Barry has had his buttons
> > > pushed particularly effectively. There's a direct
> > > relationship between how upset he is and the
> > > incoherence of his response. This post is a perfect
> > > example.
> > >
> > > I made fun of the newspaper for having used the term
> > > "perennial" for "perianal," but Barry, demonstrating his
> > > desperate need for things to be All About Barry,
> > > interpreted this, somehow, to be an attack on *him*--
> > > even though he had also made fun of the article. My
> > > comment had nothing whatsoever to do with Barry.
> > >
> > > Raunchy's hilarious take made fun of both the article
> > > and of Barry. His response did not, let us say,
> > > do anything to exemplify his frequently expressed
> > > contention that people should be able to laugh at
> > > themselves.
> > >
> > > Finally, Barry practically drowns in incoherence by
> > > suggesting that raunchy and I, as purportedly
> > > "wannabee Hindus," uncritically embrace Indian culture,
> > > and that this is why we made fun of the Indian
> > > newspaper--entirely oblivious to the contradiction.
> > >
> > > (Of course, Barry's brain goes even further in the toilet
> > > in his grateful response to navashok this morning for
> > > having, he assumes naively, shown him that what raunchy
> > > and I were ridiculing was an entirely proper and even
> > > intentional mangling of words. Pushing Barry's buttons
> > > is more than worth the effort for the amusement value.
> > > Good work, raunchy. ;-))
> > >
> >
>
