Yes context is everything and Krishnamurti's got nothing to do with this.  We 
hazard our all if we are here to have a group meditation and a facility must be 
kept which takes some organization for the general good of honest and 
enlightened citizens to work well.  For where two or three are gathered in 
meditation there is the Unified Field in their midst.  One hopes for the best 
and the best in people on earth.  
-Buck in the Dome 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
>
> That doesn't invalidate the fact that he had a genuine mystical experience
> you idiot - even your Ramana Maharishi is now enjoying with the heavenly
> ladies, the last I heard from him . Based upon Krishnamurti's story and
> even Amma's - they both have had genuine mystical experience whereas
> someone like like Maharishi, based upon what I have read so far, clearly
> hasn't had. So in Maharishi's case it's all what he has learned - he
> clearly was a very good speaker, good knowledge of the concepts he probably
> learned from someone else.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Yifu  wrote:
> 
> > **
> >
> >
> > It's also a well known fact that Krishnamurti had a long secret intimate
> > relationship with his best friend's - only the best friend (Raja) was too
> > dumb to know it! So much for "here to here". Looks like a lot of here to
> > there stuff.
> > http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/9.jpg
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well that's a POV, but Om what the hell does Krishnamurti know?
> > > > We've got work to do to get people from here to there.
> > > > -Buck in the Dome
> > >
> > > Well, Buck, Maharhisi said Krishnamurti was in unity. Specifically he
> > said 'too far gone in Unity'. Krishnamurti slipped into it, but never
> > really knew how he got there, which was why he had such difficulty getting
> > people to understand what he was talking about. That's because with
> > enlightenment, you do not get people from here to there, that is not how it
> > works, but unfortunately everyone interprets the journey of enlightenment
> > from 'here to there' rather than from 'here to here'; in fact it is not
> > even that, it is just 'here'. Maharishi understood this, as did other
> > teachers, that you have to find a way to trick the mind into thinking that
> > teaching is going to take you from some state to another state, presumably
> > a better one, to motivate the mind to engage in the practices that will
> > lead to dissolving the delusion that enlightenment is something different
> > from what you are already experiencing.
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
>

Reply via email to