--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > Yes, me thinks you people have little, no, or poor idea > what is going on here and just do not appreciate what > we have here with these Golden Domes. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes
Isn't it possible that "we people" understand *completely* what "you people" BELIEVE that you have "going on there," and just aren't fuckin' interested? For example, I understand *fully* the kind of reinforced sense of community and "belonging" that comes from twice a day, in any weather, comes from traipsing across town to do something supremely silly (like bouncing on your butt and calling it "flying") with other people. Some people get this same sense of community by painting their faces and bodies odd colors and going to football games. Others of us don't really feel the need for some sense of extended community or "belonging," and/or we really don't believe that the TMSP is particularly beneficial to individuals, and *certainly* don't believe that it is beneficial to the world or to the environment. If we honestly don't BELIEVE those things, what could *possibly* be our motivation to want to "join you in the domes?" > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > Me thinks you people do not appreciate what is here. > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Yes context is everything and Krishnamurti's got nothing to do with this. > > > We hazard our all if we are here to have a group meditation and a > > > facility must be kept which takes some organization for the general good > > > of honest and enlightened citizens to work well. For where two or three > > > are gathered in meditation there is the Unified Field in their midst. > > > One hopes for the best and the best in people on earth. > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > That doesn't invalidate the fact that he had a genuine mystical > > > > experience > > > > you idiot - even your Ramana Maharishi is now enjoying with the heavenly > > > > ladies, the last I heard from him . Based upon Krishnamurti's story and > > > > even Amma's - they both have had genuine mystical experience whereas > > > > someone like like Maharishi, based upon what I have read so far, clearly > > > > hasn't had. So in Maharishi's case it's all what he has learned - he > > > > clearly was a very good speaker, good knowledge of the concepts he > > > > probably > > > > learned from someone else. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Yifu wrote: > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's also a well known fact that Krishnamurti had a long secret > > > > > intimate > > > > > relationship with his best friend's - only the best friend (Raja) was > > > > > too > > > > > dumb to know it! So much for "here to here". Looks like a lot of here > > > > > to > > > > > there stuff. > > > > > http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/9.jpg > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well that's a POV, but Om what the hell does Krishnamurti know? > > > > > > > We've got work to do to get people from here to there. > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, Buck, Maharhisi said Krishnamurti was in unity. Specifically > > > > > > he > > > > > said 'too far gone in Unity'. Krishnamurti slipped into it, but never > > > > > really knew how he got there, which was why he had such difficulty > > > > > getting > > > > > people to understand what he was talking about. That's because with > > > > > enlightenment, you do not get people from here to there, that is not > > > > > how it > > > > > works, but unfortunately everyone interprets the journey of > > > > > enlightenment > > > > > from 'here to there' rather than from 'here to here'; in fact it is > > > > > not > > > > > even that, it is just 'here'. Maharishi understood this, as did other > > > > > teachers, that you have to find a way to trick the mind into thinking > > > > > that > > > > > teaching is going to take you from some state to another state, > > > > > presumably > > > > > a better one, to motivate the mind to engage in the practices that > > > > > will > > > > > lead to dissolving the delusion that enlightenment is something > > > > > different > > > > > from what you are already experiencing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
