--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > Me thinks you people do not appreciate what is here. > > -Buck in the Dome > > Buck, I was there just recently, didn't you see me? It's here right? > http://goo.gl/maps/bgJF0 > >
No, that's the wrong dome. These are the right ones: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Yes context is everything and Krishnamurti's got nothing to do with this. > > > We hazard our all if we are here to have a group meditation and a > > > facility must be kept which takes some organization for the general good > > > of honest and enlightened citizens to work well. For where two or three > > > are gathered in meditation there is the Unified Field in their midst. > > > One hopes for the best and the best in people on earth. > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > That doesn't invalidate the fact that he had a genuine mystical > > > > experience > > > > you idiot - even your Ramana Maharishi is now enjoying with the heavenly > > > > ladies, the last I heard from him . Based upon Krishnamurti's story and > > > > even Amma's - they both have had genuine mystical experience whereas > > > > someone like like Maharishi, based upon what I have read so far, clearly > > > > hasn't had. So in Maharishi's case it's all what he has learned - he > > > > clearly was a very good speaker, good knowledge of the concepts he > > > > probably > > > > learned from someone else. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Yifu wrote: > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's also a well known fact that Krishnamurti had a long secret > > > > > intimate > > > > > relationship with his best friend's - only the best friend (Raja) was > > > > > too > > > > > dumb to know it! So much for "here to here". Looks like a lot of here > > > > > to > > > > > there stuff. > > > > > http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/9.jpg > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well that's a POV, but Om what the hell does Krishnamurti know? > > > > > > > We've got work to do to get people from here to there. > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, Buck, Maharhisi said Krishnamurti was in unity. Specifically > > > > > > he > > > > > said 'too far gone in Unity'. Krishnamurti slipped into it, but never > > > > > really knew how he got there, which was why he had such difficulty > > > > > getting > > > > > people to understand what he was talking about. That's because with > > > > > enlightenment, you do not get people from here to there, that is not > > > > > how it > > > > > works, but unfortunately everyone interprets the journey of > > > > > enlightenment > > > > > from 'here to there' rather than from 'here to here'; in fact it is > > > > > not > > > > > even that, it is just 'here'. Maharishi understood this, as did other > > > > > teachers, that you have to find a way to trick the mind into thinking > > > > > that > > > > > teaching is going to take you from some state to another state, > > > > > presumably > > > > > a better one, to motivate the mind to engage in the practices that > > > > > will > > > > > lead to dissolving the delusion that enlightenment is something > > > > > different > > > > > from what you are already experiencing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
