Oh Devious is Me Share - LOL..no this is not about ganging about - if my comments were lashing out because of a lack of woman, or lack of respect for woman you think any of the women I mentioned would have let it pass. You only need to go through FFL archives to realize it's not.
Clever, devious but bullshit Share. That there is some cowardly, despicable ganging up on FFL is a fiction of yours. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ** > > > Thanks Steve, I appreciate the support by an individual. OTOH I really > don't want rallying around by any group, men or women, especially if it > means ganging up on someone. I find that cowardly and despicable no matter > who they're ganging up against. Just MHO (-: > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* seventhray27 <steve.sun...@yahoo.com> > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > You have always needed some intelligent brain cells and unfortunately > they don't grow around dead cells, tough luck Steve baby but I will always > find my Devi if needed because I'm sure there are tons of women who don't > need to insulate themselves into invulnerability with some elaborate, > bizarre, delusional beliefs. Nothing remotely intelligent in your blind > support for Share. > > At least nothing you would understand, in your incessant aggrandizing. > > > Seen any women here rally around Share? How about Obba? Emily? Ann? > Judy? Oh wait what is this silence - goddammit someone say something. > > Oh Ravi, really. Is your reasoning so weak that you have to rely on a > fallacy of popular belief. I believe you are capable of better that this. > > I think what is happening, and it was predicted, is that western culture > is still not a good fit for you. I suppose it must be something similiar to > "small man syndrome", that makes you feel you need to dominate, when most > others are content to just along, share, and be happy. But you insist on > being Ravi Yogi, the Great Telugu Brahmin. Well, last time I looked, it did > get you at least two "likes" on your Facebook, so that's a start at least. > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 3:30 PM, "seventhray27" wrote: > > > > > You need a real woman Ravi. This Devi crap ain't cutting it. Either > that or you're channeling Oscar Pistorius. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door > > > > > > > > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep > > > > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep > > > > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep > > > > > > > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand > smiley > > > > > smile (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > *From:* Ravi Chivukula > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the > Second > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them." > > > > > > > > > > Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude > detector > > > > > of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. You > are > > > > > hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no > longer need to > > > > > visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses have > been > > > > > reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed > - no > > > > > longer you are one of the billions with positives and negatives. > Go forth > > > > > and start your own cult O' Wise lady. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of > > > > > consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a > lot say > > > > > that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and > astral > > > > > realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to > them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > *From:* "doctordumbass@" > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM > > > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, > parallels our > > > > > consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading > the same > > > > > thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one > gets from > > > > > practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like peyote > (ick) or > > > > > mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that world, > according to > > > > > your level of consciousness at the time. > > > > > > > > > > Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the > astral > > > > > manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire > universe of > > > > > subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full > scope of > > > > > Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - Um, > kinda like > > > > > in "real" life. > > > > > > > > > > However, it is important to note what one sees with each > exploration, most > > > > > of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If the > > > > > consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the > Celestial > > > > > world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are just > like > > > > > anything else - with more experience, one has greater > discrimination, and > > > > > freedom of motion. > > > > > > > > > > If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of > "suspended > > > > > solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they will > > > > > probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and > criminals, > > > > > but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly called > "the > > > > > astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a subset, > based on > > > > > limited access. > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Freebie from Doc: > > > > > > > > > > > > This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called > "ass-tral" - > > > > > lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, > have a > > > > > low consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be > avoided > > > > > for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem to > profit, but > > > > > that's about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric > > > > > > > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it > > > > > > > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did > > > > > > > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral > > > > > > > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking > > > > > > > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. > > > > > > (schnipp) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
