I'm sorry Judy, I don't see it.  I see Share making a broad statement about 
treating people (in general) with respect. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> >
> > yea, pretty weak to throw out an accusation like that on
> > an internet forum and then to claim that since no said
> > anything that the claim stands.
> 
> I think he was making a more general observation here,
> Steve, in the form of rhetorical questions.
> 
> But we sure do see an example of what he's talking about
> in Share's response to you.
> 
> 
>  
> > either that, or just childish 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Steve, I appreciate the support by an individual.  OTOH I really 
> > > don't want rallying around by any group, men or women, especially if it 
> > > means ganging up on someone.  I find that cowardly and despicable no 
> > > matter who they're ganging up against.  Just MHO (-:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: seventhray27 <steve.sundur@>
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second 
> > > Attention, Pros and Cons]
> > >  
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You have always needed some intelligent brain cells and unfortunately 
> > > > they don't grow around dead cells, tough luck Steve baby but I will 
> > > > always find my Devi if needed because I'm sure there are tons of women 
> > > > who don't need to insulate themselves into invulnerability with some 
> > > > elaborate, bizarre, delusional beliefs. Nothing remotely intelligent in 
> > > > your blind support for Share.
> > > 
> > > At least nothing you would understand, in your incessant aggrandizing.
> > > 
> > > > Seen any women here rally around Share? How about Obba? Emily? Ann? 
> > > > Judy? Oh wait what is this silence - goddammit someone say something.
> > > 
> > > Oh Ravi, really.  Is your reasoning so weak that you have to rely on a 
> > > fallacy of popular belief.  I believe you are capable of better that this.
> > > 
> > > I think what is happening, and it was predicted, is that western culture 
> > > is still not a good fit for you.  I suppose it must be something similiar 
> > > to "small man syndrome", that makes you feel you need to dominate, when 
> > > most others are content to just along, share, and be happy.  But you 
> > > insist on being Ravi Yogi, the Great Telugu Brahmin.  Well, last time I 
> > > looked, it did get you at least two "likes" on your Facebook, so that's a 
> > > start at least.
> > > 
> > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 3:30 PM, "seventhray27"  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > You need a real woman Ravi. This Devi crap ain't cutting it. Either 
> > > > > that or you're channeling Oscar Pistorius.
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep
> > > > > > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep
> > > > > > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > **
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand 
> > > > > > > smiley
> > > > > > > smile (-:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM
> > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the 
> > > > > > > Second
> > > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude 
> > > > > > > detector
> > > > > > > of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. 
> > > > > > > You are
> > > > > > > hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no 
> > > > > > > longer need to
> > > > > > > visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses have 
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed 
> > > > > > > - no
> > > > > > > longer you are one of the billions with positives and negatives. 
> > > > > > > Go forth
> > > > > > > and start your own cult O' Wise lady.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > **
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of
> > > > > > > consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a 
> > > > > > > lot say
> > > > > > > that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and 
> > > > > > > astral
> > > > > > > realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to 
> > > > > > > them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > *From:* "doctordumbass@" 
> > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM
> > > > > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> > > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, 
> > > > > > > parallels our
> > > > > > > consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading 
> > > > > > > the same
> > > > > > > thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one 
> > > > > > > gets from
> > > > > > > practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like peyote 
> > > > > > > (ick) or
> > > > > > > mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that world, 
> > > > > > > according to
> > > > > > > your level of consciousness at the time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the 
> > > > > > > astral
> > > > > > > manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire 
> > > > > > > universe of
> > > > > > > subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full 
> > > > > > > scope of
> > > > > > > Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - Um, 
> > > > > > > kinda like
> > > > > > > in "real" life.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, it is important to note what one sees with each 
> > > > > > > exploration, most
> > > > > > > of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If the
> > > > > > > consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the 
> > > > > > > Celestial
> > > > > > > world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are just 
> > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > anything else - with more experience, one has greater 
> > > > > > > discrimination, and
> > > > > > > freedom of motion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of 
> > > > > > > "suspended
> > > > > > > solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they 
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and 
> > > > > > > criminals,
> > > > > > > but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly called 
> > > > > > > "the
> > > > > > > astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a subset, 
> > > > > > > based on
> > > > > > > limited access.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Freebie from Doc:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called 
> > > > > > > > "ass-tral" -
> > > > > > > lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, 
> > > > > > > have a
> > > > > > > low consciousness.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be 
> > > > > > > > avoided
> > > > > > > for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem to 
> > > > > > > profit, but
> > > > > > > that's about it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric
> > > > > > > > > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it
> > > > > > > > > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did
> > > > > > > > > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral
> > > > > > > > > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking
> > > > > > > > > about astral entities. What you focus on you become.
> > > > > > > > (schnipp)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to