I'm sorry Judy, I don't see it. I see Share making a broad statement about treating people (in general) with respect.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > yea, pretty weak to throw out an accusation like that on > > an internet forum and then to claim that since no said > > anything that the claim stands. > > I think he was making a more general observation here, > Steve, in the form of rhetorical questions. > > But we sure do see an example of what he's talking about > in Share's response to you. > > > > > either that, or just childish > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Steve, I appreciate the support by an individual. OTOH I really > > > don't want rallying around by any group, men or women, especially if it > > > means ganging up on someone. I find that cowardly and despicable no > > > matter who they're ganging up against. Just MHO (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: seventhray27 <steve.sundur@> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > You have always needed some intelligent brain cells and unfortunately > > > > they don't grow around dead cells, tough luck Steve baby but I will > > > > always find my Devi if needed because I'm sure there are tons of women > > > > who don't need to insulate themselves into invulnerability with some > > > > elaborate, bizarre, delusional beliefs. Nothing remotely intelligent in > > > > your blind support for Share. > > > > > > At least nothing you would understand, in your incessant aggrandizing. > > > > > > > Seen any women here rally around Share? How about Obba? Emily? Ann? > > > > Judy? Oh wait what is this silence - goddammit someone say something. > > > > > > Oh Ravi, really. Is your reasoning so weak that you have to rely on a > > > fallacy of popular belief. I believe you are capable of better that this. > > > > > > I think what is happening, and it was predicted, is that western culture > > > is still not a good fit for you. I suppose it must be something similiar > > > to "small man syndrome", that makes you feel you need to dominate, when > > > most others are content to just along, share, and be happy. But you > > > insist on being Ravi Yogi, the Great Telugu Brahmin. Well, last time I > > > looked, it did get you at least two "likes" on your Facebook, so that's a > > > start at least. > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 3:30 PM, "seventhray27" wrote: > > > > > > > > > You need a real woman Ravi. This Devi crap ain't cutting it. Either > > > > > that or you're channeling Oscar Pistorius. > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep > > > > > > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep > > > > > > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep > > > > > > > > > > > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand > > > > > > > smiley > > > > > > > smile (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > *From:* Ravi Chivukula > > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the > > > > > > > Second > > > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude > > > > > > > detector > > > > > > > of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. > > > > > > > You are > > > > > > > hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no > > > > > > > longer need to > > > > > > > visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses have > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed > > > > > > > - no > > > > > > > longer you are one of the billions with positives and negatives. > > > > > > > Go forth > > > > > > > and start your own cult O' Wise lady. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of > > > > > > > consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a > > > > > > > lot say > > > > > > > that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and > > > > > > > astral > > > > > > > realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to > > > > > > > them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > *From:* "doctordumbass@" > > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM > > > > > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > > > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, > > > > > > > parallels our > > > > > > > consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one > > > > > > > gets from > > > > > > > practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like peyote > > > > > > > (ick) or > > > > > > > mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that world, > > > > > > > according to > > > > > > > your level of consciousness at the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the > > > > > > > astral > > > > > > > manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire > > > > > > > universe of > > > > > > > subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full > > > > > > > scope of > > > > > > > Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - Um, > > > > > > > kinda like > > > > > > > in "real" life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, it is important to note what one sees with each > > > > > > > exploration, most > > > > > > > of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If the > > > > > > > consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the > > > > > > > Celestial > > > > > > > world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are just > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > anything else - with more experience, one has greater > > > > > > > discrimination, and > > > > > > > freedom of motion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of > > > > > > > "suspended > > > > > > > solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and > > > > > > > criminals, > > > > > > > but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly called > > > > > > > "the > > > > > > > astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a subset, > > > > > > > based on > > > > > > > limited access. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freebie from Doc: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called > > > > > > > > "ass-tral" - > > > > > > > lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, > > > > > > > have a > > > > > > > low consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be > > > > > > > > avoided > > > > > > > for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem to > > > > > > > profit, but > > > > > > > that's about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric > > > > > > > > > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it > > > > > > > > > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did > > > > > > > > > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral > > > > > > > > > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking > > > > > > > > > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. > > > > > > > > (schnipp) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
