--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote: > > > > > > And even if you like Lynch's movies for their artistic value as films, > > > the subject matter is often some sick twisted stuff - and he credits TM > > > with unleashing his creativity to make such trash > > > > > > Oh really ? You are as off about art as on any other subject. > > > The films of Lynch is about human struggle towards dignity, love and > > > Light. Terms utterly alien to MJ. > > > > > > So in what way is Eraserhead about the human struggle towards dignity, love > > and light? It's about a guy whose wife gives birth to an alien > > baby with its internal organs on the outside, then his head falls off > > and gets made into pencils. Great movie (Lynch's first and best) but > > highly disturbing. > > > Eraserhead is the most spiritual film Lynch ever made, something he also > acknowledges himself. But the same struggle and reach for human dignity can > be seen in all his films. Every one of them without exception. Lynch didn't > become a living legend by making what to some simple souls seems to be horror > movies. > > To see light and love in art can't be taught. Either it resonates with you or > it doesn't. Which mean those, ten and thousands of his fans, experience > something which you don't. > You might find it "disturbing" and MJ calls it "trash". Perhaps this says > something about your ability to perceive. > Just an idea.
Ill wager that if Lynch didn't do TM, you'd think it was trash too. Not just an idea. PS To me, disturbing is good.
