The thing that is so fucking interesting about you is how many opinions you have that aren't substantiated by much, even the experience of reading someone else's experience. Do you really think that the title of the book or the assumption that the book is about NDE's is what is important?
I will look up the word laywoman - ha. That's funny. >________________________________ > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:04 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Proof of Heaven - has anyone actually read this >book? > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: >> >> I just finished this book. It is quite accessible to >> a laywoman such as myself and is quite fascinating >> from many perspectives. > >I have not read the book, and in fact have no >interest whatsoever in reading or hearing about >people's NDE experiences; I'll find out what, if >anything, happens after death soon enough, when >I have a DE. > >The only reason I'm writing is to comment on your >use of the word "laywoman." I understand the usage, >but am just pointing out that you might reconsider >the term because the last time I heard it, it was >being used by an Amsterdam prostitute to describe >what she did for a living. :-) > >Should anyone be so humor-impaired as to no longer >be able to recognize one, this was a joke. > >As for NDE's, IMO more people should be concerned >with having NLE's than NDE's. That is, they're so >worried/concerned/planning for what happens after >death that they miss Life entirely. > > > > >
