--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> > 
> > ---  Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jason, I liked your analogy and I think Judy asks a valid
> > > question.  What say you?
> > > 
> > > ---  "Jason" <jedi_spock@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > (snip)
> > > > Allow me to rephrase the topic.
> > > > 
> > > > Judy's thesis is this.  There is a dark room. You are inside 
> > > > it in darkness.  There is bright light outside. The windows 
> > > > are covered with blinds with no light coming in.
> > > > 
> > > > You slowly open it a little bit with very dim light coming 
> > > > in. Later you let some more light come in.  it's brighter. 
> > > > Again later you allow a little more light to come in.
> > > > 
> > > > The room slowly become brighter and brighter until it's 
> > > > fully illuminated from the light outside.
> > > > 
> > > > Salyawin's thesis is this.  You are in a dark room.  You 
> > > > have a bulb and very tiny batteries.  You connect the 
> > > > batteries to the bulb and get a very dim light.  
> > > > 
> > > > Later, you connect it to a bigger set of batteries and the 
> > > > light is slightly brighter.  A little later, you connect it 
> > > > to a even larger battery and so on.
> > > > 
> > > > The room becomes brighter and brighter untill it's fully 
> > > > illuminated with powerfull batteries.
> > > > 
> > > > Which is could be correct?
> > > > 
> > > > If consciousness is an emergent phenomena that comes from 
> > > > the ability to sense the outside universe, it would need the 
> > > > hardware. It would be objective.
> > > > 
> > > > If consciousness came from the intelligence of the totality 
> > > > of nature's laws, it's a software issue.  The Qualia aspect 
> > > > of reality is interesting. It's subjective.
> > > > 
> > > > Bring it on, Xeno Taxius, Judy, Salyawin. 
> > > >
> > ---  "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > How do you account for the "you" in either of the above
> > > scenarios? Where did it come from?
> > 
> > Could it be that the self-awareness or the feeling of "I am" 
> > is inherent or intrinsic in everything starting from an 
> > electron.
> 
> Weeeelllll...maybe.
> 
> > If every electron "knows" the position of every other 
> > electron in the universe......
> > 
> > I think you nailed me.  Got to give you credit.  Well played 
> > Judy.
> 
> It's amazing how easy it is to overlook.
> 
> Some scientific folks insist very firmly that the sense of
> self is just an illusion that processes in the brain create.
> 
> Oh? And what/who is being fooled by it?

Another part of the illusion. Go to sleep and they both disappear.
Clever stuff.


Reply via email to