Yes, that is consistent with your negative view of the world. In spite of that, yes, I truly revel in the householder's life and non-attachment!
I wake up every day in freedom, and go to bed each evening the same way. I am relatively young, in excellent health, and no longer have to work. I am surrounded by friends and family full of love, and live in a spectacularly beautiful part of the world. No more bananas for you, Barry, yet I do enjoy tweaking that nose of yours, when it grows too long. May you too, one day, live a life of non-attachment, and unfettered happiness! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Yes, I absolutely revel in the householder's life and > > non-attachment, both!! A perfect combination! > > Then again, you see no contradiction in spending all > week obsessing on a guy who hasn't been replying to > you while preaching non-attachment and talking about > it as if you knew what the term meant. > > Just as a free clue, this inability to see your own > contradictions is why you have zero credibility here. > I mean, really...the same guy who pretends to be > enlightened once pretended for several months to > be a woman. And has pretended to be several other > people, denying explicitly that each new persona > was him, then "busting himself" by posting some- > thing under that persona copyrighted to Jim > Flanegin. Go figure. > > What many of us wonder is if you *believed* these > fantasies each time. We're pretty sure that you have > deluded yourself into believing that you're enlightened. > But did you really *believe* you were a woman all that > time? > > THAT would be weird, even for Fairfield Life. :-) >
