Well, then, what you are saying is that there is a serious disconnect between what Share was "feeling" and the reality, given the complete lack of evidence for her accusation and all it's attendant implications. "Feelings aren't facts" and all that. Again, responsibility for oneself comes to mind. You give Robin a lot of power, Xeno. Did he hurt your feelings?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > Dear Share, > > Pay close attention now..... > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqWMKKC1Clg > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqWMKKC1Clg> > > You accused Robin of unconscionable behavior. You took no > > responsibility at all for what was in your internal landscape that could > > have generated such a reaction. You never came up with a single valid > > demonstration of your accusation on his part. You never apologized to > > Robin in public, where it should have happened, given what you spread > > all over FFL. Your internal dishonesty will continue to prevent you > > from understanding compassion. > > Emily, nice to see you back. I think Share basically does not respond to > things intellectually, but on the level of feeling. I had a similar reaction > to Robin, I felt his approach was strangely invasive, like watching cancer > take over one's body. > > Why do so many people on this forum see so much dishonesty in people who > write here? > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > turq, I enjoy some of what Robin writes and think he adds to the > > richness of FFL so would welcome his return. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 3:10 AM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Announcing the Robin Carlsen Memorial > > Narcissism Award > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > For those who pride themselves either on their corpulent egos or their > > misguided belief in their own writing abilities (or both), we are > > pleased to announce a mini-contest on Fairfield Life. The duration of > > this contest extends through the rest of 2013, and will be repeated > > annually. The recipient will receive the coveted Robin Carlsen > > Narcissism Trophy, a large statuette of the word ME carved by a known > > artist from a solid block of bullshit, and then gold-plated. > > > > > > The rules of this contest are simple: > > > > > > > > > * You must write a number of "serial posts," each with the same > > Subject line, each lambasting some personal enemy who has affronted you, > > and whom you must officially Take To Task, For The Greater Benefit Of > > Humanity. > > > > > > * Each of these serial posts must be (in honor of the poster whose > > name adorns the trophy) a minimum of 3,000 words in length. You may > > "pad" your entries somewhat by including long quotes from the person you > > are ragging on, but if the word count of these quotes exceeds your own > > verbiage, you risk disqualification. > > > > > > * Each of the serial posts in a series must have a singular focus, in > > that most of the rants have to be trying to "get" one specific enemy. Of > > course you can throw in the occasional tirade against *other* people on > > this forum you hate, but again if you include too many, you risk > > disqualification. > > > > > > * The number of posts to be included in this series is up to you, but > > be warned that the "standard" in this contest was set by its namesake, > > so any number less than five in a row, separated by any more than a day > > between posts, will be perceived (and rightly) as the slacking it is. > > > > > > * At the end of your post series, to qualify for the award you must > > present an impassioned, whiny plea/demand to the hate-object you are > > ragging on (and to anyone else reading your post series) to RESPOND, and > > in fact respond by arguing with you about *every* point you made. You > > are free to impugn their character in any way you want if they do NOT > > respond, and you are free to make multiple whine-posts demanding a > > RESPONSE, even after the series is over. > > > Points will be awarded for the total number of posts per series, total > > word count, and amount of sheer invective hurled, as well as lack of > > creativity and bad writing (which we assume is a given for anyone > > entering the contest). > > > > > > Extra points will be awarded for achieving near-Robin-like levels of > > manic narcissism and obsession, as demonstrated by the posts being made > > late at night, well after midnight posters' time, staring > > > glassy-eyed at the screen and spewing venom non-stop in a veritable > > shitstorm of invective. (This should not be a problem for anyone > > choosing to enter such a contest, judging from past history.) > > > > > > *Serious* extra points will be awarded to posters taking their *own* > > faults and weaknesses and projecting them onto their enemy. > > > > > > Good luck, and may the Best Narcissist win... > > > > > >
