My *goodness*, what a load of bullshit from Xeno in this thread. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > On 7/5/13 10:14 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, "emilymae.reyn" > > > <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, then, what you are saying is that there is > > > > a serious disconnect between what Share was > > > > "feeling" and the reality, given the complete lack > > > > of evidence for her accusation and all it's > > > > attendant implications. "Feelings aren't facts" > > > > and all that. Again, responsibility for oneself > > > > comes to mind. You give Robin a lot of power, > > > > Xeno. Did he hurt your feelings? > > > > > > He did not hurt my feelings. If someone has a feeling > > > though, that is usually a spontaneous response. Why > > > should evidence be required to express what one feels?
My feeling is that you are a child molester, Xeno. No, I don't have any evidence. Why should I? > > > One does not need to take responsibility for oneself. One > > > needs to take responsibility for the response to what one > > > does. Telling someone to take responsibility for themselves > > > is an attempt to make someone feel guilty. And Xeno doesn't like to feel guilty. He wants to be able to say whatever enters his mind without having to take any responsibility for it. No wonder he's a fan of Barry. > It is an attempt to demean and take control. Translation: When he's asked to take responsibility for what he says, Xeno feels demeaned and controlled. > > > It is a useful technique, but it does not give a > > > person the incentive to move into a space where > > > they think of improving themselves on their own. Translation: Xeno does not want to have to think about improving himself. > > More idiotic bullshit Xeno - remember your sociopathic > > traits, you can't feel empathy - so how would you know > > Share's feelings? Remember Share has confessed to being > > easily triggered and suffering from attachment disorder. > > She's very emotionally, psychologically stunted. > > So Share is psychologically stunted? Have you no compassion > for your fellow human being then? A context-switch worthy of Curtis. Of course, observing that a person is psychologically stunted doesn't have anything to do with whether the observer has compassion for the person. Note also that here Xeno suggests that Ravi's purported lack of compassion for Share means he has no compassion for any of his fellow human beings. And the rest is bafflegab: > A sociopathic trait does not necessarily represent a full blown sociopath or > psychopath. I know no one's feelings other than my own. I have to infer > others' feelings. I do not have access to other minds except by inference by > what the bodies that I assume have those minds say and do. How did you assume > that I was making an attempt at empathy? If I have none, as you suggest, even > bringing up the subject is a red herring, a diversionary, inconsequential > argument. And if I have, why attempt to show I do not, if you feel empathy is > a desirable trait? >
