You just don't get it Judy - just stop the lying. There is an an echo in
here - but you already knew that. LoL!
On 11/27/2013 11:33 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. *
**
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote:
What is she going to say? She's been caught telling a deliberate
untruth and she can't refute it. Go figure.
On 11/27/2013 9:06 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy asked if there was an echo in here. I guess she hasn't noticed
how many times she's posted about refutation, etc.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:02 PM, Richard J. Williams
<punditster@...> <mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
This your your style I guess.
On 11/27/2013 6:03 PM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. *
**
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <punditster@...>
<mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
I've been an respondent on the internet since 1999, so it's not like
I'm a newbie or something. And it's been my observation that Judy
has a really big ego, maybe bigger even than Barry, and that's
saying a lot! There are facts and there are opinions - facts can be
argued, but an opinion stands no matter what, and that's everyone's
right to express - you may not agree, but there should be no excuse
for slandering your debating opponents.
It's like when some people call others 'nazis' all the time - it
soon loses its force, and in the end doesn't do justice to the real
nazi victims.
At first I thought Judy was being very astute when she called Barry
a liar over and over again; then she started going after me with the
same tactic. For awhile I thought there was something wrong with me
and that maybe I did lack integrity. But now, after Judy called Buck
a liar for no reason at all, I've come to the conclusion that Judy
is simply a well-poisoner.
That's her style I guess.
Hey, I'm all for truthfulness and personal integrity, but I'm just
not sure dialoging with anonymous informants in an online chat-room
is the place to prove it - this is supposed to fun, not a trial by a
one-person judge and jury.
But, it has reached a level now that she's calling almost everyone a
liar, a troll, and/or a poser.
At this point, she's just a very unpleasant person to deal with and
not very informative either. And, there's no relief when anyone
starts up a dialog with her - it's incessant and endless. Barry is a
case in point - from what I can tell, Judy carries a grudge for a
very, very long time. Go figure.
P.S. You may have noticed that Judy does NOT respond very elegantly
to constructive criticism. If anyone can point to an untruth I've
posted, please let me know and point my error - be specific, so we
can resolve any misunderstandings. Thanks in advance.
On 11/27/2013 10:33 AM, Share Long wrote:
I think Truth is something huge, that cannot really be completely
conveyed in words alone. Unless the speaker or writer is
communicating from a very settled and integrated level of
consciousness. OTOH, unless someone has a nefarious intention, I
think most people try to communicate truthfully. But each of us is
limited by our connection to Truth. The most trustworthy people,
imho, are those who recognize this and intend to become more and
more truthful.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:21 AM, Richard J. Williams
<punditster@...> <mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
Maybe, but I almost always suspect someone of not being totally
honest when they post as an anonymous informant. I used to post
under various handles until I got outed, and so I decided when I
retired, I would just use my real name. I've got nothing to hide
and nobody can fire me from my job since I'm self-employed now. But
using a handle is no biggie to me because I understand why some
people need to keep their privacy.
But, I did get a little paranoid reading Bill's post where he
claimed Ravi had stalked or threatened, to what - expose Bill and
his wife. What's up with that?
That's when things get REALLY nasty around here - I wouldn't blame
Rick if he shut down the whole discussion group, if that's what
going to happen here on a regular basis! It is always troubling to
see someone get banned from the group. Where I used to work, you
had to really screw up big time to get fired - like smoking pot in
the parking lot or something like that. Hardly anyone gets banned
on FFL - Kirk got banned for cursing too. Go figure.
And, I don't care if people post mean things about me sometimes -
it could always just be a joke of some kind - like when Barry2
posted that my real name was Walter White. LoL!
On 11/27/2013 8:49 AM, anartaxius@... <mailto:anartaxius@...> wrote:
/*10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth*/
http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/
We are not face-to-face on FFL, it's all words, words, words.
There are those here who make a big deal of their integrity.
Perhaps that is a suspect trait.