See, this is what happens when a group tolerates dishonesty. When there are no sanctions against it, not even disapproval, even the weaker members start using dishonesty to justify themselves, as Share does here. The more people who feel safe being dishonest, the more a mythical, false story about the group and its members and interactions takes shape and displaces the real one. History, as they say, is written by the winners, so those who care about having an accurate history need to ensure the liars don't win.
Here's the post in question; decide for yourselves whether Share's description of it below is truthful (note the many qualifying phrases that Share flatly denies it contained--including, ironically, "it sounds like," which she specifically mentions below): http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/319521 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/319521 Plus which, as I've pointed out before, Share had gotten on my bad side well before this. Share lied: > Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012. She said that I did such > and such in my post to RWC. She did not qualify with in my opinion or it > sounds like or even I think. Of course she didn't ask me if I was doing such > and such. She just declared that I did such and such as if she could see > inside my head and know, without error, what I had been thinking and > feeling. I had never experienced someone communicating like that. It was > like a foreign language and as such, I didn't even know how to respond. > I've come to think that no matter what anyone says, Judy will not change. In > fact, I've come to think that she likes it when she has to fight with > everyone.
