You bet, it is true there is a large 'field effect' boost from a mature and deeply experienced teacher of transcending meditation when the teaching is transmitted directly. There is some spiritual physics working there that Centering Prayer is not necessarily respecting. I never sensed that those monks that ripped TM off respected that which was going on as Maharishi set it up. They just looked at us like we were a bunch of whet behind the ear kids. There are teachers and there are teachers. Getting a meditation from a sat guru teacher, even a TM teacher who has put in the spiritual time, is a large boon to someone's meditation. Good point to make Authfriend, -Buck in the Dome
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote: The truly distinctive aspect of TM is how it's taught. And that's the biggest difference, actually, between TM and Centering Prayer: TM is taught "live," one-on-one. Rather than a step-by-step set of instructions to follow, TM has the teacher taking the student through the experience of meditating on an individualized basis in a way that can't be duplicated by following printed instructions because it's so nondirective. Centering Prayer doesn't recognize the difference and takes certain selected bits from the TM procedure and puts them on paper, from which you're supposed to be able to learn how to do Centering Prayer. (No doubt it also holds "live" learning sessions,but just the fact that it says you can learn Centering Prayer from a book speaks of a fundamental gulf in understanding.) When you think about it, the amazing thing about TM is not that it's so easy to learn and practice, but that it can be taught at all. Yes, Centering Prayer is a rip-off of TM. But there are precursors remarkably like TM in the earlier Church, especially among the Quietists. The 17th-century Miguel de Molinos taught us to turn our attention inward without imagination and adopt a passive attitude to whatever arises in your mind (soul). One aspect that reminds me of TM is that Molinos assures us there is no reason to worry when thoughts are distracted, because it is not necessary to think of God (ie, to have one's attention turned inwards) during the whole time of the prayer. The prayer still continues provided that one has been sincere in starting the session - it's up to God what happens during the allotted time. Sounds similar to the TM idea one should favour the mantra but be relaxed about allowing other thoughts to arise. He was found guilty of inappropriate sexual contact with his female disciples (sound familiar?). He admitted the charge but claimed they were "purifying acts caused by the devil". Ah yes! We've all had those. He was condemned for heresy and died in prison. The 14th-century English classic The Cloud of Unknowing also has parallels with TM and advises repeating a one- or two-syllable word. So a passive attitude and a "mantra" - all that's missing is an initiation fee.