I don't have time for all this social networking crap. I get 20
somethings from Google+ and LinkedIn telling me what to do for social
networking like I care. No wonder we have some many unemployed in the
US, they spend all their time social networking! :-D
On 02/20/2014 01:17 PM, Share Long wrote:
noozguru, I have recently been horrified by what was appearing on MY
Facebook page and was not put there by me! So I unfriended a lot of
people I had friended in the past before I knew what that meant.
Anyway, I know some people love FB but I think it's a gigantic spider
web of whatever! Instead, give me a troll ridden forum any day! (-:
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 PM, Bhairitu
<noozg...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Arianna Huffington decided she hated "anonymous" comments on
Huffington Post. I had an account there for years to comment though I
didn't post comments very often. So the last time I tried to post a
comment they wanted to verify it with my "Facebook" account. Dumb
woman, doesn't understand that not all of use want to be on Facebutt.
Arianna, like Bill Maher, is a limousine liberal who espouses liberal
views for the money but probably vote conservative in a heartbeat if
it suits their pocketbook.
On 02/20/2014 10:17 AM, Share Long wrote:
Trolls and snarks and goof offs, oh no!
(to the tune of *lions and tigers and bears, oh no* from The Wizard
of Oz)
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:58 AM, Bhairitu
<noozg...@sbcglobal.net> <mailto:noozg...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 02/20/2014 07:17 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 2/19/2014 7:13 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> The article is more about comment trolls than trolling on forums or
> groups.
>
There's a difference? Go figure.
I wouldn't even call what he is talking about "trolls". It's mainly
goof-offs posting snarky comments and not trying to get anything
started. There will be a few that will try to troll a comment section
but most are off to another article to post snarky comments.
Sometimes the snarky comments are funny and to the point and that
wouldn't be trolling either. And of course Morford claims not to
read the comments section as his solution (bet he does sometimes).
Sure, we get snarky posts here but then they will stick around to see
if their "troll" worked.
> Mark maybe doesn't hangout in any groups or forums.
>
The description of a "troll" posted by the two Barry's and Judy don't
seem to match the one described in the report. Why do you suppose they
would be so insecure that they would post fibs about trolls on FFL?
Where is Dr Pete when we need him? Go figure.
"Sociopathic, sadistic, narcissistic, cruel by nature, highly
unpleasant
to be around. They love to cause pain. They delight in ruining the
beautiful. The more pure and integrity-filled something is, the more
they enjoy corrupting it."
http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2014/02/18/how-to-eat-an-internet-troll/
