Ever been to India, Michael?

On 03/25/2014 04:37 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:

Upon further reflection, I am honored to learn from one who knows more than a billion Hindus. Tell you what, let's test your theory and resolve. Fly to India, choose any large city, go to the area where the Hindus eat their lunches, stand up on a soapbox and say loudly "Hinduism is not a religion, it is a philosophy! Hinduism is not a religion, it is a philosophy!" repeat it over and over and loudly. Those of us on FFL will sent condolences to your widow.
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 3/25/14, Bhairitu <noozg...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: No Mantra will cure willfully arrogant stupidity
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2014, 5:58 PM





























Can't do
much about those who wish to
remain ignorant.



On 03/25/2014 09:54 AM, Michael Jackson wrote:





you are as full of shit as a Christmas goose
to say that
Hinduism is a philosophy - there are about a
billion
Hindus who disagree with you.

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 3/25/14, Bhairitu <noozg...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:



Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: No Mantra
will cure
willfully arrogant stupidity

To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2014, 4:06 PM



























































So did you get

a "buzz" from the puja?

You should and that's probably why you
liked it.

The "buzz" would

be the increase of "shakti" which
is

something not well understood

by western science.







Another thing we need to remember is that just
the

word "Hindu"

was a form of ignorance created by invaders of
the

Indus Valley

who could not pronounce a word starting with

"I" so they put an

"H" in front.  Sort of of a joke.







And "Hinduism" just like MMY said,
is indeed

a philosophy just

like Buddhism and not a religion.  The

"invaders" also thought the

practices constituted a
"religion."  And

truly there are some

Indians who practice it
"religiously." :-D







On 03/25/2014 08:07 AM, salyavin808 wrote:























No Mantra will cure willfully arrogant

stupidity? Hmmm, seems like that's the

sort of thing meditation was designed

for. Is it too

late for a

refund?







I

don't know why

you people get so upset at a few

inconvenient facts. I'm

an athiest and I loved the puja, all that

bowing and

singing and incense, just like some sort of

religious

thing but not a religious thing because it

was all in

foreign and quite enjoyable anyway, so why

would it

matter? Unless you are some sort of

religious person who

has what they are allowed to do proscribed

by someone

else, but who would admit to that? As the TM

teacher

said: if you like ceremonies it's a nice

one. If you

don't, it's a short one. And

besides, I wanted to get my

hands on the enlightenment and the

supernatural powers

the book promised, so I would have sat

through a hymn

service at the local church.

Almost.







Anyhoo's, I don't

remember any god doing anything for me

lately so I

conclude that the origin of mantras is

irrelevant, and

also about as irrelevant as other TMO

teachings I had

plowed into me like the "fact"

that most of classical

Indian literature happens to be present in

my body in

some, unspecified, way. Which seems to me

about as

religious a statement as you could

possibly

make.







Coincidentally, you

can cure people of any health problem at all

by chanting

the relevant section of something called the

ved at the

unwell part of the body in another

undoubtably secular

(and not cheap) ceremony in order to redress

the

balance. According to the latest

"discoveries" of

Maharaja Raja Raam (Tony to his friends) the

reason we

get ill in the first place is because the

battles of the

Ramayana are being fought out in our bodies.

Astounding.

Order me an obviously secular yagya

immediately!







But

mantras I don't

care about. I mean, obviously they

come from

some hindu or pre-hindu teaching, all this

stuff does

and all this stuff is ancient. The question

is, why

would that be a surprise to

anybody?









---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,

<emptybill@...>

wrote :









Recently I

have read here on FFL an argument

professed by

former TM’ers who stopped

practicing because they claimed they

were deceived

about the

"meaning" of

mantras.







I don't

believe anyone has stopped for that

reason. Usually

they quit because they don't think

like it or don't

think it has enough reward for the time

invested.







Some

people seem to take to it like ducks to

water and

become full of flashy experiences and

evangelical

zeal, I know I did. Go

figure.....
















































































































Reply via email to