From: Richard J. Williams <pundits...@gmail.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Marshy
On 4/7/2014 1:33 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
So in what way is him having a girlfriend a contradiction?
>
For example, Judith's story of her short stay at the yoga camp seems
like a contradiction: how could Judith get past the skin boy in the
living room, evade Ms Jemima Pittman at the front door, and Jerry
and Debbie in the next cabin, and everybody else in the yoga camp,
in the dead of night, when you could hear a pin drop - that MMY
could get a big gal like Judith in through the bathroom window, into
his bedroom, down on the floor on his deer skin, in front of a
painting of SBS.
It just doesn't make any sense.
Maybe they went out on the veranda or up on the roof. Who knows -
nobody saw it - so it's self-contradictory. Any proposition that is
self-contradictory does not exist. It's pretty much agreed that MMY
did not rape Mia Farrow. There's nothing like the cross examine.
I'll ignore Richard's obvious troll bait and focus on the highlighted phrase
above. It's perfect, to describe the 'tude that a number of the confrontation
junkies have on this forum. It's like they believe they are prosecutors in some
cosmic court of law (or Laws Of Nature), and thus have the right to say
anything they want about the people they're trying to "best" to challenge (and
demean) their credibility. That alone is kinda weird, but the kicker is that
they honestly seem to believe that the people they're trying to troll *have* to
reply, so that they can extend the "cross examination."
