From: "lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Meditators and Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016? I'm sorry, did you miss the word "allegedly?" Why even mention it, unless you consider it within the realm of possibility? My replies assumed you do. If you do not, consider them rhetorical questions. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : From: "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:46 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Meditators and Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016? Well, there's floating during TM-SIdhis pracice, and then there's floating during daily activity. Allegedly someone fully in Unity could perform any and all TM-SIdhis at any time, in any circumstance. And you believe this why? But of course, MMY never demonstrated floating in public that I have heard of and never said that he had floated, only that he could if he wanted to. Oh, my bad. You believe it because some guy who could never demonstrate it said it. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : From: "LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Could they float? Apparently that was a minor test for immortality in Maharishi's eyes: if they were well-enoughed established in Unity that they could float whenever they wanted, they might be immortal. Trying to ignore the nonsensical nature of the entire theory, I would suggest that if you believe in it then you have to admit that Maharishi was never able to float (levitate). There are no "minor tests" for immortality. There is only one test, and it's fairly major -- if you die, you're not. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : What about people like Ramana Maharishi and Ramakrisna who died of cancer? On 05/14/2014 05:53 AM, fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: >>>>Once you know yourself, not just intellectually, but in every way possible, unbounded awareness, cancer cannot get a foot hold. Cancer is usually an emotional disease, although it eventually manifests physically. Any repressed block of emotion can solidify into a cancer. >>>> >>>>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote : >>>> >>>> >>>>Of course destroying words is no solution at all. But just think how the word *cancer* can affect people, making their heart race, causing all those fight or flight hormones to be released in the body. What is the solution for that? >>>> >>>>On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:59 AM, "anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Well, that was a double plus good quotation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <raunchydog@...> wrote : >>>> >>>> >>>>Ah ha! Buck wins the battle of semantics but remains powerless to control the wild beasts of FFL. Don't give up, Buck. The place wouldn't be the same without you. "Do you know that Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year?...It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words." Orwell 1984 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>
