From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : "Now, please, please, pretty please, go away." Yet another unfulfilled desire. Whatever happened to those magical, enlightened powers of yours that give you (paraphrasing your own words) the "ability to fulfill all of your desires?" Did the warranty period on these powers expire, or did they -- like your other claims of enlightenment -- never exist in the first place? For that matter, what happened to all of those descriptions of the enlightened that folks here were given by Maharishi about "line on water," and how the enlightened are so unattached that nothing bothered them? Surely one of those enlightened folks wouldn't get so upset by something some stranger on the Internet said that they'd have to plead with the person to GO AWAY, right? Frankly, it seems that the person being "discredited" here is the person posturing as enlightened, while unable to walk the talk of enlightenment. YOU, after all, are the person whose panties are so in a bunch that you're pleading with someone whose posts bother you to GO AWAY. Sure doesn't sound very "enlightened" to me. Heck, it doesn't even sound very manly...more like a whiny little pussy saying "Go away and stop saying all these true things about me...I don't like it and if you don't stop I'm going to hold my breath until I turn blue!" At least then you'd be more like Krishna... :-) :-) :-) I'm pretty sure I read that enlightened people experience everything in the world as being themselves, therefore it isn't possible for you to go away and why would InfiniJim want you to anyway, how could he possible be annoyed at a part of himself? The behaviour I would expect him to display is complete understanding not knee-jerk anger, and then how about preventing enemies before they arise? That ought to be small beans to someone in such a rarified state. Something here doesn't make sense, maybe he's annoyed that we don't automatically accord him respect like they all did to Marshy.... It really *doesn't* seem to make much sense, does it? After all, Little Willy has made almost 7,000 posts ragging on me because he's so jealous that I and a few hundred other people saw someone levitate and he didn't. You don't see *me* getting all uptight about this and throwing tantrums the way Jim does, do you? And I'm not even enlightened. :-) It sure seems to me that someone who was actually enlightened wouldn't be the record-holder back in the "posting limits" days for spending the most days "on the bench," unable to post because he so lacked control that he couldn't count to 50. It seems to me that someone who was actually enlightened might not be as concerned about what other people think of his fantasies as Jimbo is. It seems to me that a person who was really so enlightened that he can fulfill ALL of his desires might have found a way to "manifest" his dream house rather than live in a trailer park reading the real estate ads. NONE of this act seems to make sense. Unless you consider all of it the delusions of a particularly attention-starved old guy having a post-retirement crisis, that is. Then it makes perfect sense. Oh well...he's always got the BATGAP forum. They'll believe ANYTHING over there. :-) ________________________________ From: "fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: ENLIGHTENMENT MYTHS I am not "claiming enlightenment experiences for attention". You have already been thoroughly discredited, as an ex-TM teacher, on here, with no clue about enlightenment; what it is, and your two weeks lifetime witnessing, bolstering your ego, like a counterfeit hundred dollar bill in your back pocket. You are smarting from the demonstration you have inadvertently given, over the last few weeks, of how little you know, and how much of what you say is absent of any kind of facts, or intelligent reason, regarding enlightenment. Your decades with spiritual teachers have been largely a waste of time, and you are here to bleat and whine, looking for a target, when it is right in front of you, staring back at you, from your bathroom mirror. You can continue in your endless campaign to champion all of the delusions and ignorance of waking state. Just be honest about it, and quit trying to blame your sorry ass life, on me, Barry. I had nothing to do with it. Thanks in advance. Now, please, please, pretty please, go away. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote : Judy, imo Robin slimed himself when he wrote a post and signed Curtis' name to it. You and others slime yourselves when you don't acknowledge that this was wrong to do; when you in fact cheer about it and or make light of it. Ah Share, love does funny things to people. Judy's ego is obviously out of control and she thinks that being close to Robin makes her the sort of big deal she obviously thought Robin was. Having to feel like you are special around here is seriously odd behaviour IMO. It's all those highly flattering emails I'll bet. Lonely old woman gets charmed by a smoothie like Robin - she didn't stand a chance. We should all feel sorry for her. While I agree with the "we should all feel sorry for her" thang, I might propose another theory about this scenario. What if these supposed emails from Robin NEVER HAPPENED? What if, instead, Judy developed an obsession on him the way some stalkers do on celebrities and started stalking *him* -- not only on FFL, but attempting to do so in email? Given her nearly 20-year history of stalking people she's developed an obsession with, isn't it possible that she -- like Jimbo imagining his "enlightenment experiences" to puff up his ego and get a little attention in the only way he knows how -- developed an obsession on Robin and started *imagining* that she had a "relationship" with him? I think we can all accept that, given the way she obsesses on him now, Judy wrote a number of stalking emails *to him*, professing her love for him and assuming he'd write back declaring his similar undying love for her. But what if he *never wrote back*, and Judy is just hallucinating all of this? Makes sense, doesn't it? It also adds another element to Robin turning tail and running away from FFL. What if he were not just high-tailing it after realizing that he couldn't suck Curtis into another one of his abusive confrontations, but was taking advantage of that cover story to get away from *Judy*, whose emails were getting creepier and creepier by the day? I mean, the guy was probably growing afraid that she'd stalk him physically to Toronto and show up at his doorstep, all dripping with fat and craziness and love-juices, expecting him to "service" her the way he had in her fevered stalker-dreams? It's just a theory. But I think it explains things better than your suggestion that she was just another lonely old woman taken in by a smooth-talking psychopath. I mean, it took her all these months after Robin ran away with his tail between his legs to start claiming how "in close communication" she was with him, right? Sounds suspicious to me. I think that the "deranged stalker" theory covers more bases. And actually, given the fact that we've all seen Judy's photographs, this theory is more flattering to Robin, too.
