Trem23, 

 Regarding Q1, you have to understand who started this thread in the first 
place.  The person who started it is a self-proclaimed "non-theist".  You can 
ask him what this means.  You may or may not get a consistent answer from him.
 

 Regarding Q2, MMY said that everything in the world is based in consciousness. 
 We've been debating this point with some members here for some time.  And, as 
you can gather, the debate is still on-going.
 

 You may be interested in hearing John Hagelin's explanation of the unified 
field, as shown in the link below:
 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrcWntw9juM 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrcWntw9juM

 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <inmadison@...> wrote :

 there seem to be 2 questions running through this thread:  1) is a belief in 
God a mental illness and 2) is a belief in God justifiable.

the first question is too cumbersome for me - having the notion of mental 
illness imbedded in the question . . . and I can't speak as to what a mental 
illness is, but the question  is believing in the efficacy of trickle-down 
economics a mental illness could be fun  : )

Re the 2nd question, I'm skipping is there a proof for the existence of God 
since it's pretty clear no such proof exists - and I'm suggesting:   is a 
belief in God justifiable?

We may believe in many things where there is no direct evidence, or no proof, 
but yet that belief is justifiable.  For example, we may believe someone lied 
to us, even though we have no proof.

[BTW - I am very much an amateur philosopher]     I am going to restate the 2nd 
question as:    Is a believe in the existence of component or realm beyond the 
physical/material justified?  When I use the expression 'physical/material' I 
include anything that is physical/material, or anything that interacts with the 
physical/material.

An individual who did not believe a belief in God was justified, would believe 
that the material/physical world was sufficient to explain all observable 
phenomenon, including the existence of the of the physical/material world 
itself.

For me, I think the question is a bit of a red herring, but I admit to having  
read and heard nuanced and elegant expressions regarding the need for the 
nonphysical (spiritual) to explain stuff like value, and the moment by moment 
appreciation of an otherwise brutish world.


Reply via email to