Anartaxius says here that millenarians, 'they seem to never take the direction 
and form intended'. Never? It could be well argued that these four millenarians 
created broad and lasting cultural changes, for instance. It is informative in 
an examination of organizations and their sociology to look at how in 
leadership they went about doing it, by contrast.       

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote :

 Yes, Doug, but transformations occur in society almost as a matter of course, 
but they never seem to take the direction and character that those who believed 
there was an upcoming transition would have it. So having a belief, which is a 
pretence to knowledge, one's imagination of what might be or is, is simply a 
superfluous mental attitude that traps the mind in a particular rut while the 
world goes on its merry way. Obviously these beliefs, even if they are wrong 
which they tend to be, do have an influence on the progress of change because 
they alter a person's behaviour, but the underlying forces of change are not 
concerned with imagination.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 Mao, Maharishi with his 'Ideal Society', even LBj with his 'Great Society', 
also Roosevelt and the 'New Deal' by effect in culture were the larger 
'revolutionary millenarians' of the last Century with their leadership towards 
creating 'Heavens on Earth'.  As a study I find it informative to look at their 
speeches for the language that activated people and brought people along in 
revolution, by contrast with a TM movement of this Century which in its own 
character of leadership has been unable and in decline for 40 years.  The 
contrast around  'inclusiveness' is stark.     
 

 Millenarianism (also millenarism) is the belief by a religious, social, or 
political group or movement in a coming major transformation of society, after 
which all things will be changed.    Millennialism 
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennialism  [by contrast] is a specific form 
of millenarianism based on a one-thousand-year cycle, which many sects of 
different religions believe.    A Chaney, Princeton.edu
 

 http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Millenarianism.html 
http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Millenarianism.html 
 

 Revolutionary as an adjective,  the term revolutionary refers to something 
that has a major, sudden impact on society or on some aspect of human endeavor. 
Dictionary.com
 

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 Maharishi's Little Blaze-Orange Book 

 Maharishi’s Absolute Theory of Defence | Maharishi University Press 
http://www.mumpress.com/government-administration/a14.html 
 
 http://www.mumpress.com/government-administration/a14.html
 
 Maharishi’s Absolute Theory of Defence | Maharishi Univ... 
http://www.mumpress.com/government-administration/a14.html Maharishi offers the 
indomitable strength of invincibility to the military by bringing military 
power into alliance with the invincible power of Natural Law.


 
 View on www.mumpress.com 
http://www.mumpress.com/government-administration/a14.html
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  


 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 Thanks, you raise really interesting points.  Buck spent considerable time 
looking for form of leadership in inspirational speeches by finding historic 
famous speeches of historical famous leadership rallying moments.  In 
experiment then transposing them over to try to stem the breech in Dome 
numbers, you will find those throughout Buck's many contributions to FFL: 
Washington, Frederick, King Richard, Asad, Chamberlain and others.   

 No, Buck never did Adolf as Adolf is way too loaded to have much of a 
conversation about.  Though that passage in that in the band of brothers movie 
given by the German general to his surrendering troops Buck did use at a point 
with good effect against the haters.  
 

 You hit upon a distracting problem though where people may miss the import of 
how leadership is done whence there is attribution given.  People get easily 
distracted by attribution, like you did with the Mao attribution.  The 
quotations themselves are real interesting to look at if separated from his 
name.  Yes, he was a miserable administrator and made errors in decisions of 
governance like some other famous millenarian revolutionaries of the 20th 
Century we know.  But as a revolutionary at a time he was effective in the 20th 
Century.  The Little Red Book is interesting to look at for its study in 
leadership.  It is relevant still in the 21st Century.
 

 Your last point about transparency given the nature and speed of data in the 
internet world is absolutely right.  Survival for any group in the modern world 
is going to be readily marked against ethical behavior. There is no hiding bad 
behavior..   that is a lot of the wrangling going on now within TM.. how to 
proceed.  -JaiGuruYou  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 The Little Red Book?  Looking at leadership qualities a while ago I got to 
wondering about Mao's voice of leadership in their revolution and sat down and 
read his 'quotations', the little red book. I was wondering 'how' he did it? It 
is quite a tight organizational prompting and type of capable leadership. 
Seemed something that our own movement has been missing for quite a few years. 
  In process I did a mash-up of “Mao in to TM” to see how it sounded.

 

 "Showing it around to local folks here, if they are not first prejudiced by 
knowing the quotations come from Mao, they generally recognize it as effective 
leadership that we do not have and could wish for in our own movement 
organization."

Did you ever have the same idea about 'Mein Kampf' of Adolf Hitler? 

About Mao: His policies caused the deaths of tens of millions of people during 
his 27-year reign, more than any other Twentieth Century leader... 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong#Legacy 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Zedong#Legacy

Maybe at the time of Mao it was possible to clue people together by a single 
book, and to mass control peoples thoughts. This time is over now, with the 
advent of the Internet transparency has increased so much, that it will be hard 
to control people in the same way. Finally, the TMO has to come to realize this 
too, all the TM secrets are written down in the Internet. Deal with it.
 

 

 

 #
 


 All we are saying is let's give peace a chance. John Lennon- Give Peace a 
Chance with Lyrics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhyiqGIJQus
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhyiqGIJQus
 
 John Lennon- Give Peace a Chance with Lyrics 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhyiqGIJQus Give Peace a Chance by John Lennon 
with Lyrics :) The music in this video does not belong to me


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhyiqGIJQus
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
  

 
  










Reply via email to