---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :

 No, not conflating what was evident that some people posting here were 
exploitatively seeking to inflict methodical and personal emotional hurt on 
people using a Yahoo-group [FFL]. For a touch on an energetic component of this 
abuse see the post over at The_Peak, #4901 davidfb108 on spiritual violence,
 

 Like the Yahoo-group guidelines seeks to corral this kind of incivility on 
their groups these millennials [meditators] I am watching working here are 
seeking to curb a type of coercive violence [oppression] they see held in 
communal mores and behavior that they well describe as patriarchal. These are 
not grade-schoolers. They are quite old enough with stake in it and do respect 
aspects of the spiritual community enough to hope to perpetuate instead basic 
needs [inalienable right?] for safety within the institutions for a communal 
well-being in what evidently is coming down to the very survival of the 
institutions of the movement themselves. 
 

 A lot is going on inside right now inside the various elements of what is TM. 
Maybe you are uncomfortable with process like this or against where it might 
lead. But for instance well-intended millennials and others of goodwill in the 
larger community are actively bringing in work in inter-cultural tolerance with 
workshops and presentations for various elements of the community and promoting 
classes and workshops on campus in communal strategies and skill-sets like, 
NVC. Like with the Yahoo-groups guidelines this is all very much about the 
social sustainability of groups for individuals for good reasons. 
 

 ..NVC [nonviolent communication] begins by assuming that we are all 
compassionate by nature and that violent strategies—whether verbal or 
physical—are learned behaviors taught and supported by the prevailing culture. 
NVC assumes in process that violent communication strategies can be unlearned.  
 
I think I'm pretty comfortable with the guidelines as they are clearly or not 
clearly delineated here. I know for one thing that a whole bunch of people feel 
a whole lot more comfortable writing posts at FFL since you took over as 
moderator and asked some of the members, who were consistently throwing mud and 
rotten fruit at others, to leave. I'm just tired of continually having to wash 
my face and clothes after posting here and now that the need for that has 
vanished it is way better, for me. All this talk about personal freedoms being 
taken away is balderdash and highly melodramatic. And what I'm getting now, is 
that Doug is not so interested in controlling (via the Yahoo guidelines) the 
actual content but is more interested in creating a space where those who want 
to contribute can do so without getting heckled or humiliated or being 
subsequently misrepresented as a means to intimidate. The trolls trying to 
disguise themselves as free thinkers are actually doing more to take away 
anyone's freedom of speech than the moderator. If I get canned at some point, 
then so be it. It is not important as some personal liberty denied that I was 
no longer allowed to post at FFL, of all places. I have a life and it doesn't 
rely on my posting status here remaining intact for it to be a full one. 
 

 

 Heckled and humiliated? Throwing mud and fruit? We were reading different 
forums.
 

 No, you accused me of doing the same with reference to Xeno. You just don't 
recognize it when the posters you like do it to others. This is what bugs me 
the most - the hypocrisy. When your friends sling shit around it is 
well-reasoned arguments, when others do it they are teenaged girls mimicking 
what goes on at FB. You have a serious double standard for such a scientific 
guy, Sal.
 

  I read a lot of well argued counter arguments to the TM dogma. TM claims to 
be a science, therefore it gets criticised. That's what science is, people 
arguing until they reach a consensus based on the evidence. 
 

 Here is what you still don't understand about me. I don't give a flying fuck 
what anyone says or thinks about TM. It is often a post that has dick-all to do 
with TM that I usually find most boorish and that is, to be exact, the posts 
that get all personal and repetitive and twisted that consciously misrepresent 
and falsify what others are saying. I resent the trollish, dickish posts that 
people like your buddy bawee was notorious for. I don't, and most others here 
included, did not have a problem with dissenting viewpoints about TM and not 
one person who has been chucked out of here was done so because they said 
something "mean" about TM. It is about personal space and mutual civilized 
respect that can at least result in interesting and intelligent dialogue. 
Slinging shit around like its ones personal soapbox is a total drag.
 

 It's obvious that what Buck wants is a place where nobody can have a contrary 
opinion to what he believes in. That's why he uses terms like "apostate". But 
you can';t live in a world like that, there has to be dissent or nobody ever 
learns anything, you all just sit there agreeing with each other. What sort of 
discussion forum is that for crissakes? But I can see why people are scared of 
it.
 

 Scared? Puhleeeze. No one is scared of Doug. No one's "rights" are being taken 
away by Doug. If he clears out this forum what is stopping anyone from taking 
their voice elsewhere? Nothing - as we can all see since we are three groups 
now. 
 

 You don't understand very well. I said that people shouldn't scared of 
criticism. That's what this is all about.
 

 You are getting really clueless if you think that one person deciding to clear 
people off a forum because they just want to or can't cope is acceptable. If 
you don't care why do you come here every day? Why were you first back after 
Buck started his rampage?
 

 And calling people like that trolls is a very poor effort. You got to think 
about what they say, not whether you personally agree with it.
 

 Absolutely, I am calling bawee a troll because he is not interested in 
discussion. It has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with him, it is 
about his intention and delivery. He simply has a terrible need to be someone 
and FFL is all he's got. If you want to enable and stroke him then by all means 
do it but thankfully it can be at FFL2 and not here where there are others who 
have a far more valid and friendly desire to exchange ideas. 
 

 You should do yourself a favour and drop this "Bawee" nonsense, you are a 
grown up human right?
 

 Enable and stroke? This is kindergarten stuff. Not even that actually.
 

 DNR.
 
 









Reply via email to