According to the Urban Dictionary it is the plural of ginny:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ginny

Which puts a whole new twist on Mike's post. :-D
On 12/01/2015 01:25 PM, feste37 wrote:

Your auto correct must have a mind of its own, since according to Merriam-Webster, there is no such word, ginnie. I think it is just messing with you. I loathe auto correct, which I regard as a snobbish, superior type who always thinks it knows better than I do what I want to type. Trouble is, it almost always gets it wrong, but it never learns.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

You know, I really wish my program would stop *correcting* my spelling in the middle of a word that I'm typing! That was supposed to be guinea pig. I would have spelled it wrong in the first place but gone back to double check it and get it right, But noooooooooooooooooo, it has to be intuitive!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 1, 2015 10:38 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] New Drug




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

With such fanfare about things like this, it's usually prudent to watch what happens. Let others be the Ginnie pig.

Mike, you crack me up. First of all "ginnie" is hilarious but your honest attitude is rather endearing as well. How can I not like you even though I agree with you on practically nothing? LOL

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 1, 2015 8:51 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] New Drug

I wonder what percentage of people who saw the initial headline/news report of this purported wonder pill believed it could do what it claimed. It would be an interesting demographic study to know that, for me at least. I, being the sceptic I am, dismissed it out of hand immediately but I am not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing since I hadn't even bothered to read further than the first sentence or two. Now, I see my skepticism was justified (no surprise in this case) but I wonder where my doubting nature came from.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/a-pill-that-will-take-you-to-120-and-cure-alzheimers-yes-that-was-too-good-to-be-true






Reply via email to