The really problematic dimension of suffering is not personal (if one 
can indeed become "detached" from internal desire or aversion) - it 
is interpersonal. Try being detatched whilst your loved ones are 
being tortured... 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli Mattsson" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli Mattsson"
> <Irmeli.Mattsson@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > I still believe that it owes a lot to Buddhism...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That's a stretch. Many translations of the First
> > > > > > Noble Truth have it as "Life is suffering," but
> > > > > > that's not related in any way to God, since they
> > > > > > don't believe in one.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To say "life is suffering" implies there is something--
> > > > > a condition or state--that is *not* suffering.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If suffering is said to be a lack, there is something--
> > > > > a condition or state--in which nothing is lacking.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What is it?
> > > >
> > > > ++ State of mind?
> > > 
> > > In a way. If (as the Four Noble Truths state) the
> > > cause of suffering is attachment to desire/aversion,
> > > then living in a state of mind that is *not* attached
> > > to achieving the fruits of desire or avoiding the
> > > things one is averse to is a way beyond suffering.
> > > 
> > > The "input" to life doesn't change, only one's
> > > ability to greet it with equanimity. Try to force
> > > the square peg of that input into the round hole of
> > > one's desires, and you get suffering. Treat it as
> > > a square peg and be neither attached nor averse,
> > > no suffering. 
> > > 
> > > Nothing to "achieve," no "obstacles" to remove from
> > > the "path" to non-suffering, nowhere to "go." Same 
> > > old same old...just life dealt with as What Is, not 
> > > What You'd Like Life To Be.
> > > 
> > > Just for fun, compare and contrast this to MMY's
> > > latest U.N. rap, in which he once again presents his
> > > S-V theories and suggests that the problems of the
> > > world can't be solved unless one starts over with
> > > all-new buildings. In the Buddhist view, this 
> > > approach to resolving suffering can never work
> > > because it is based upon trying to change the input
> > > of life to avoid suffering, rather than change the 
> > > inner being's ability to deals with the input with-
> > > out attachment. 
> > > 
> > > In the Buddhist view, the richest, most successful
> > > person in the world, living in a perfectly-aligned
> > > S-V house but still attached to his desires, will
> > > be lost in suffering. Whereas the poor person who
> > > lives in a cardboard box, if he is not attached to 
> > > his desires, is beyond suffering.
> > >
> > 
> > ****
> > The basic division between suffering and non-suffering lies in, as
> > Barry puts it, if you can accept  `What is', or if you want to 
make
> > life what you want or dream it to be. Paradoxically also accepting
> > 'what is' much more effectively leads to transformation and true
> healing.
> > 
> > The latter way was my way of functioning until age 16. I perceived
> > many faults and defects in myself and wanted to become like some 
of my
> > peers I admired. The efforts I made to change myself lead mainly 
to
> > big disappointments and even to worsening of my problems. 
> > 
> > Then at 16 I got the realization that life doesn't expect me to be
> > like someone, it accepts me as nothing. Life accepts me as no one.
> > There is an evolutionary impulse deep in life's functioning. All I
> > need to do is to align with this evolutionary impulse. It meant
> > `active passivity'.  Passivity meant accepting yourself as you 
are, or
> > being nothing, and not trying to become something. Active meant 
being
> > alert in nothingness and acting when an impulse appeared from deep
> inside.
> > 
> > This was a start of a highly interesting and exciting journey of 
life
> > consciously appreciating transformation. And I want to emphasise 
the
> > word start. I had just got a stable platform. Being established on
> > that I can keep basic stability and calm in the whirls of true
> > transformation and even enjoy the journey, just as you can find a
> > roller coaster ride very enjoyable.
> > 
> > For a person, who does not rest on this kind of very stable 
platform,
> > enlightenment as a dream state means a blissful end station, 
where all
> > the whirls of painful creation and destruction have ceased. There 
the
> > essential nature of life is a threat, and enlightenment means you
> > don't need to re-incarnate anymore.
> > 
> > Felt pain, mental or physical, is an important source of 
suffering.
> > Pain that one can accept I don't call suffering. It is just a very
> > intense sensation. Fear makes pain worse. Embracing resolves it. 
This
> > is of course much more easily said than done. I know this myself
> > thoroughly through my own life experience.  I have a hereditary
> > muscular disease. For a very long time (from childhood on, getting
> > worse when I became adult) I felt very uncomfortable pain in my 
hands
> > and feet. At worst it felt like an awful pain in my bones. I was
> > afraid of this pain. It made me react physically to it by 
contraction,
> > which made the disease progress. The culmination of this process
> > happened in –92, when intense burning and tingling sensations 
appeared
> > in my feet. My feet were like burning, and simultaneously it could
> > feel like they were in ice and freezing. It was awful. However I
> > recognized hidden rage in this pain and started to work with it. I
> > engaged myself also in long psychotherapy to help the rocess.
> > 
> > Gradually the burning sensation started to diminish and my 
perception
> > of it to change. I can still occasionally have intense burning
> > sensations in my feet, but now I can appreciate this sensation as
> > blissful. The unpleasant pain in my hands I can also appreciate 
better
> > nowadays. The shift of perception has changed the advancing of the
> > disease to slow healing. My feet are stronger than they were at –
92.
> > And my hands are also better, so I can work again much better with
> > computer. I still cannot write much by hand, but there is clear
> > improvement there also.
> > Because I have accepted what is, I have never felt myself to be
> > suffering during this journey.  
> > 
> > Irmeli
> >
> ****
> I want  as a clarification add that the realization or shift in
> perception that happened to me at 16, was not an logical 
intellectual
> idea that I started to follow.
> It was a sudden shift, that felt like a second of dizziness in my 
head
> while I was walking downstairs. After it I felt different, very 
calm,
> even and light. And I started to observe myself to be functioning
> differently. Earlier I had felt very hurt, when my mother screamed 
and
> yelled to me. From now on it had not impact on me. 
> The intellectual understanding and description of my new way of
> functioning appeared  only after I started to observe and analyse my
> functioning. There was no possibility for me to slip back to the old
> way of functioning. It just didn't exist anymore, nor did I miss it.
> 
> Irmeli
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to