> Yes, you can assume I wasn't desperate for a > putdown, given all the opportunities you've > been providing lately, such as your hilariously > off-target fantasies about my purported lifelong > inability to attract men, your inexplicable > notion that I imagine "hoardes [sic] of > persecutors," and your impossibly convoluted > attempt to relate them to each other: > > "I cannot help but laugh at women who in their > old age imagine hoardes [sic] of persecutors the > same way they imagined hoardes [sic] of suitors > when they were young, therefore I exist." > > The last phrase doesn't even make sense syntactically.
I see. As opposed to: >> Kinda makes you rethink all the research that >> claims benefits for long-term TMers, eh? :-) > > Yer gonna need knee-replacement surgery soon, Barry. -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 24, 2006 And your response makes sense in what universe? :-) > Oh, and your "hoardes" was clearly a spelling error, > in contrast to my "vanisingly," which was obviously > a typo. > > (Not that I never make spelling errors, but they're > usually in more difficult words; and I don't tend > to get all freaked out when somebody notices them.) Two quotes for this one: 1) "If you had just said, "Oh, yeah, I should have used the term 'process' rather than 'experience,'" that would have been that. We all inadvertently goof on the terminology from time to time. The fact that you're going way around Robin Hood's barn to deny you used the wrong term suggests that either you still don't understand *why* it's the wrong term, or that you find it necessary to try to cover up the mistake." -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 24, 2006 2) >> Says the pot to the kettle. > > Hardly. When I make a mistake, I admit it. -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 24, 2006 > > Can we further assume that calling me a drunk, which > > you have now done twice in one week when you *were* > > desperate for a putdown and couldn't think of anything > > else to say, is representative of the kind of integrity, > > honesty, fairness, and lack of hypocrisy you claim to > > represent here? > > I think you're not really in a position to ask such > a question given the demented outburst I just quoted > above. It is still my honest opinion of you, mispelling and all, demented though it may be. And it was written stone sober. Here...I'll write another, three weeks now into having touched no alcohol at all (because I'm on a diet...I don't have anything against alcohol, just its calories): All of this attacking me lately is because I pointed out how much of a hypocrite you are in your posturing as the defender of all things TM here, when in fact you have never done anything in your life to put your actions where your mouth and your ego are. You never became a TM teacher, and by the fact that you avoided answering my question about whether you had ever even checked someone, I assume that you haven't -- you just learned the procedure so you could use it to put people down when it came up on a.m.t. You haven't done diddley, and you never will. You're all talk, in it only for the "credit" you seek so desperately. One last quote, in which you are honest for once about what you *really* think of all the people here at Fairfield Life: "At the time, I had really been trying to cut down on the number of arguments I got into. After that, I said screw it. There will always be a few people who dislike me enough to falsely portray what's gone on in an exchange, and not enough of the rest are interested in what's true and what's not to do a fair evaluation and give me credit for trying to *avoid* an argument." -- Judy Stein, FFL, Jul 27, 2006 To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
