In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led
> by those that would never have committed to liberating Afghanistan
> because "no nation has ever conquered the Afghans and we would
> fall into the same trap that the Russians fell into".

Sorry, but imaginary scenarios about what Gore
or Kerry would have done do not an argument make.

As for our having "liberated" Afghanistan, you
don't read the news much, I gather.

No those were common liberal arguments why we should not invade Afghanistan. Kind of like the 50,000 body bags for US soldiers to take Baghdad caused by gas and chemical attacks. I never heard any conservative arguments why we should not invade Afghanistan.Yes Afghanistan is liberated and has a democratically elected government. Are things perfect and peaceful? No.But definitely better off now than under the Taliban.
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to